...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Influence of non-invasive measurements of arterial blood pressure in frequency and time-domain estimates of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity.
【24h】

Influence of non-invasive measurements of arterial blood pressure in frequency and time-domain estimates of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity.

机译:无创测量动脉血压对心脏压力反射敏感性的频率和时域估计的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) obtained by the Finapres device and from the direct measurement of arterial blood pressure (ABP) values from the ascending aorta, using both spectral analysis and sequence analysis. DESIGN: A cohort study of 45 coronary artery disease patients undergoing routine percutaneous coronary procedures. METHODS: Continuous supine recordings of resting ABP in the finger (Finapres), ascending aorta (Millar catheter-tip transducer) and electrocardiogram were obtained. Beat-to-beat values of systolic ABP (Finapres and aortic) and R-R interval were used to estimate the cardiac BRS from spontaneous sequences and by spectral analysis, using the alpha index for the low-frequency band (0.05-0.15 Hz). The influence of beta-blockers on BRS estimates was also investigated. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between estimates of BRS derived from the Finapres (BRSFIN) and aortic ABP (BRSAO) by the spectral analysis method (Finapres bias 0.30 +/- 2.52 ms/mmHg). For sequence analysis, BRSFIN was significantly higher than BRSAO (7.80 +/- 4.52 versus 6.44 +/- 3.46 ms/mmHg), but the bias (1.36 +/- 3.10 ms/mmHg) was not significantly different from spectral analysis. No significant differences in BRS were found between beta-blocker users (n = 24) and non-users (n = 10) for either the processing method or source of ABP recording. CONCLUSION: Spectral analysis of cardiac BRS showed a better agreement between estimates obtained from the Finapres and aortic ABP.
机译:目的:使用频谱分析和序列分析,比较Finapres装置和直接测量升主动脉的动脉血压(ABP)值所获得的心脏压力感受器敏感性(BRS)的估计值。设计:一项对45名接受常规经皮冠状动脉手术的冠心病患者的队列研究。方法:连续仰卧记录手指(Finapres),升主动脉(Millar导管尖端换能器)和心电图静息ABP。收缩期ABP的逐搏值(Finapres和主动脉)和R-R间隔用于通过自发序列并通过频谱分析,使用低频频段(0.05-0.15 Hz)的α指数来估算心脏BRS。还研究了β受体阻滞剂对BRS估计值的影响。结果:通过光谱分析方法(Finapres偏倚0.30 +/- 2.52 ms / mmHg),从Finapres(BRSFIN)和主动脉ABP​​(BRSAO)得出的BRS估计值之间没有观察到显着差异。对于序列分析,BRSFIN显着高于BRSAO(7.80 +/- 4.52对6.44 +/- 3.46 ms / mmHg),但偏差(1.36 +/- 3.10 ms / mmHg)与光谱分析没有显着差异。对于ABP记录的处理方法或来源,β受体阻滞剂用户(n = 24)和非用户(n = 10)之间的BRS没有发现显着差异。结论:心脏BRS的频谱分析显示,从Finapres和主动脉ABP​​获得的估计值之间有更好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号