...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Correction to “Impacts of climate change, ozone recovery, and increasing methane on surface ozone and the tropospheric oxidizing capacity”
【24h】

Correction to “Impacts of climate change, ozone recovery, and increasing methane on surface ozone and the tropospheric oxidizing capacity”

机译:对“气候变化,臭氧恢复以及甲烷对地表臭氧和对流层氧化能力的影响”的更正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the paper “Impacts of climate change, ozone recovery, and increasing methane on surface ozone and the tropospheric oxidizing capacity,” Olaf Morgenstern et al. (Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 118, 1028–1041, doi:10.1029/2012JD018382, 2013) found that tropospheric photolysis rates were largely unaffected by stratospheric ozone changes and that other effects, e.g., due to differences in cloud cover or the sea ice albedo effect, were more important. Recently, an error has been discovered in the model setup used by Morgenstern et al. [2013]: Actually, photolysis rates in their model had not been based on the correct, interactive ozone field; instead, an ozone climatology had been used which did not respond to any differences in forcing between the simulations. Despite this error, the present-day reference presented by Morgenstern et al. [2013] compared well to observations; e.g., the background climatology of total column ozone in their Unified Model - UK Chemistry and Aerosols Module (UMUKCA) model was quite realistic, surface ozone for present-day conditions compared reasonably to observations, and the methane lifetime in UMUKCA was close a recent multimodel result [Voulgarakis et al., 2013]. Nonetheless, the model’s tropospheric chemistry did not quite realistically respond to ozone recovery. Other feedbacks, particularly stratosphere-troposphere exchange and the warming and moistening of the troposphere under climate change, were adequately captured. Telford et al. [2013] and studies derived from that paper are not affected by this issue.
机译:Olaf Morgenstern等人在“气候变化,臭氧恢复以及甲烷对地表臭氧和对流层氧化能力的影响”一文中指出。 (地球物理研究杂志,大气,118,1028–1041,doi:10.1029 / 2012JD018382,2013)发现对流层光解速率很大程度上不受平流层臭氧变化和其他影响的影响,例如由于云层或海洋的差异冰的反照率作用,更为重要。最近,在Morgenstern等人使用的模型设置中发现了一个错误。 [2013]:实际上,他们模型中的光解速率并非基于正确的交互式臭氧场;取而代之的是,使用了臭氧气候学,它对模拟之间的强迫没有任何区别。尽管存在此错误,但Morgenstern等人提供的当前参考文献中却有提及。 [2013]与观察结果进行了比较;例如,在他们的统一模型-英国化学和气溶胶模块(UMUKCA)模型中,总柱状臭氧的背景气候非常真实,与观察值相比,当今条件下的表面臭氧合理,并且UMUKCA中的甲烷寿命接近于最近的多模型结果[Voulgarakis等,2013]。尽管如此,该模型的对流层化学反应并不完全符合臭氧回收率。其他反馈,特别是平流层-对流层交换以及气候变化下对流层的变暖和增湿,也得到了充分的反映。 Telford等。 [2013]和该论文衍生的研究不受此问题影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号