...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestion >Capnographic monitoring during endoscopic submucosal dissection with patients under deep sedation: a prospective, crossover trial of air and carbon dioxide insufflations.
【24h】

Capnographic monitoring during endoscopic submucosal dissection with patients under deep sedation: a prospective, crossover trial of air and carbon dioxide insufflations.

机译:内镜下黏膜下剥离术中深部镇静患者的二氧化碳监测:一项关于空气和二氧化碳吹入的前瞻性交叉试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safety of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation has not been fully established for esophageal and gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) under deep sedation, because CO(2) retention is not only caused by CO(2) insufflation but also by the sedation level and the patient's respiratory status. To clarify the clinical safety of CO(2) insufflation, we conducted a crossover trial of air and CO(2) insufflations. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with early esophageal or gastric cancers underwent ESD during which insufflation was switched from CO(2) to air or from air to CO(2); transcutaneous partial pressure CO(2) (PtcCO(2)) was monitored in all patients. We also assessed respiratory function, arterial blood gas analysis, and smoking history. RESULTS: Although significant increases in PtcCO(2) from baseline were observed, there were no significant differences in PtcCO(2) levels during CO(2) insufflation compared with levels during air insufflation in groups that received CO(2) preceding air or air preceding CO(2). All patients underwent ESD safely without adverse events, including 20 patients with subclinical respiratory dysfunction. The sedation protocol was the only significant predictor of CO(2) retention, independent of CO(2) insufflation. CONCLUSIONS: CO(2) insufflation can be used as safely as air insufflation during ESD under deep sedation.
机译:背景与目的:深度镇静下食管和胃镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的二氧化碳(CO(2))吹入安全性尚未完全确立,因为保留CO(2)不仅是由CO(2)引起的充气,还取决于镇静水平和患者的呼吸状况。为了阐明CO(2)吹入的临床安全性,我们进行了空气和CO(2)吹入的交叉试验。方法:共有60例早期食道或胃癌患者接受了ESD治疗,在此期间,将注气从CO(2)转换为空气或从空气转换为CO(2)。在所有患者中监测经皮分压CO(2)(PtcCO(2))。我们还评估了呼吸功能,动脉血气分析和吸烟史。结果:尽管观察到PtcCO(2)从基线显着增加,但在接受空气(CO)(2)或空气之前接受CO(2)的组中,CO(2)吹入期间的PtcCO(2)水平与空气吹入期间的水平没有显着差异前面的CO(2)。所有患者均安全接受了ESD治疗,没有发生不良事件,包括20例亚临床呼吸功能不全的患者。镇静方案是CO(2)保留的唯一重要预测指标,独立于CO(2)吹入。结论:在深度镇静下进行ESD期间,CO(2)吹入可以与空气吹入一样安全地使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号