首页> 外文期刊>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: Official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology >The assessment of back muscle capacity using intermittent static contractions. Part II: Validity and reliability of biomechanical correlates of muscle fatigue
【24h】

The assessment of back muscle capacity using intermittent static contractions. Part II: Validity and reliability of biomechanical correlates of muscle fatigue

机译:使用间歇性静态收缩来评估背部肌肉容量。第二部分:肌肉疲劳生物力学相关性的有效性和可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: In a previous paper, standard surface electromyographic (EMG) indices of muscle fatigue, which are based on the lowering of the median or mean frequencies of the EMG power spectrum in time, were applied during an intermittent absolute endurance test and were evaluated relative to criterion validity and test-retest reliability. The aims of this study were to assess mechanical and alternative EMG correlates of muscle fatigue. Methods: Healthy subjects (44 males and 29 females; age: 20-55 yrs) performed three maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) and an endurance test while standing in a static dynamometer. Surface EMG signals were collected from four pairs of back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level, iliocostalis lumborum at L3, and longissimus at L1 and T10). The test, assessing absolute endurance (90 N m torque), consisted of performing an intermittent extension task to exhaustion. Strength was defined as the peak MVC whereas our endurance criterion was defined as the time to reach exhaustion (Tend) during the endurance test. Mechanical indices quantifying physiological tremor and steadiness were computed from the dynamometer signals (L5/S1 extension moments) along with EMG indices presumably sensitive to variable load sharing between back muscle synergists during the endurance test. Results: Mechanical indices were significantly correlated to Tend (r range: -0.47 to -0.53) but showed deceiving reliability results. Conversely, the EMG indices were correlated to Tend (r range: -0.43 to -0.63) with some of them particularly correlated to Strength (r = -0.72 to -0.81). In addition, their reliability results were acceptable (intra-class correlation coefficient >0.75; standard error of measurement <10% of the mean) in many cases. Finally, several analyses substantiated their physiological relevance. These findings imply that these new EMG indices could be used to predict absolute endurance as well as strength with the use of a single intermittent and time-limited (5-10 min) absolute endurance test, a practical way to assess the back capacity of chronic low back pain subjects. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:简介:在先前的论文中,在间歇性绝对耐力测试中应用了基于肌电功率谱的中值或平均频率随时间降低的肌肉疲劳的标准表面肌电图(EMG)指数,并对其进行了相对评估判断有效性和重测可靠性。这项研究的目的是评估肌肉疲劳的机械和替代EMG相关性。方法:健康受试者(男44例,女29例;年龄:20-55岁)站在静态测力计中进行了三个最大自愿收缩(MVC)和耐力测试。表面肌电信号是从四对背部肌肉(L5水平的多裂肌,L3的i腰肌,L1和T10的长肌)收集的。该测试评估绝对耐力(90 N m扭矩),包括执行间歇性的筋疲力尽任务。强度定义为峰值MVC,而我们的耐力标准定义为在耐力测试中达到疲劳(Tend)的时间。根据测力计信号(L5 / S1延伸力矩)以及EMG指数计算出了量化生理震颤和平稳性的机械指数,该EMG指数可能对耐力测试期间背部肌肉增效剂之间的可变负荷分担敏感。结果:机械指标与Tend显着相关(r范围:-0.47至-0.53),但显示出欺骗性的可靠性结果。相反,EMG指数与Tend相关(r范围:-0.43至-0.63),其中一些特别与强度相关(r = -0.72至-0.81)。此外,它们的可靠性结果在很多情况下是可以接受的(类内相关系数> 0.75;测量的标准误差<平均值的10%)。最后,一些分析证实了它们的生理相关性。这些发现表明,这些新的EMG指数可通过使用单个间歇性和限时(5-10分钟)绝对耐力测试来预测绝对耐力和力量,这是一种评估慢性背痛能力的实用方法腰痛的受试者。 (C)2007 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号