【24h】

Does quantitative EMG differ myotonic dystrophy type 2 and type 1?

机译:定量肌电图是否会区别2型和1型强直性肌营养不良?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Genetic testing is considered the only reliable diagnostic approach in myotonic dystrophy. However it has recently been reported that a considerable number of patients with genetically proven types of the disease have unusual phenotypic presentation. The aim of our study was to evaluate motor unit reorganization reflected by various electrophysiological abnormalities in myotonic dystrophies and to compare findings between type 1 (DM 1) and type 2 myotonic dystrophy (DM2). Quantitative electromyography(EMG) recordings in 63 patients (33 with DM1 and 30 with DM2) from the biceps brachii (BB), rectus femoris (RF), first dorsal interosseus (FDI), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles were analyzed. Mean amplitude and size index (SI) of motor unit potentials recorded in TA and RF muscles, mean potential duration in TA, and mean SI and the number of outliers with amplitude above the normal range in BB were significantly increased in DM2 as compared to DM1. Myotonic discharges were recorded more frequently in DM1 than in DM2. EMG findings significantly differ between DM1 and DM2. The presence of high amplitude potentials in lower limb muscles in DM2 patients, atypical for myogenic muscle lesions, could be explained by muscle fiber hypertrophy observed in muscle biopsies.
机译:基因检测被认为是强直性肌营养不良症唯一可靠的诊断方法。但是,最近有报道称,相当多的具有遗传学证实的疾病类型的患者具有异常的表型表现。我们研究的目的是评估强直性肌营养不良中各种电生理异常所反映的运动单位重组,并比较1型(DM 1)和2型强直性营养不良(DM2)之间的发现。分析了63例患者的定量肌电图(EMG)记录,这些患者来自肱二头肌(BB),股直肌(RF),第一背骨间肌(FDI)和胫骨前(TA)肌肉(其中DM1 33例,DM2 30例)。与DM1相比,在DM2中,记录在TA和RF肌肉中的运动单位电位的平均幅度和大小指数(SI),在TA中的平均电位持续时间,在BB中的平均SI和BB超出正常范围的异常值数量明显增加。 DM1中的强直性放电比DM2中的更频繁。 EMG发现在DM1和DM2之间存在显着差异。 DM2患者下肢肌肉中存在高振幅电位,这是非典型的肌原性肌肉病变,可以通过在肌肉活检中观察到的肌肉纤维肥大来解释。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号