...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastroenterology >Clinical trial: Effects of an oral preparation of mesalazine at 4 g/day on moderately active ulcerative colitis. A phase III parallel-dosing study.
【24h】

Clinical trial: Effects of an oral preparation of mesalazine at 4 g/day on moderately active ulcerative colitis. A phase III parallel-dosing study.

机译:临床试验:口服美沙拉嗪4 g / day对中度活动性溃疡性结肠炎的疗效。 III期并行剂量研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oral mesalazine formulations are effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is not clear what induction dose of mesalazine is optimal for treating patients with active UC. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 versus 2.25 g/day for selected patients with active UC. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study in 39 Japanese medical institutions. A total of 123 patients with moderately active UC received 4 g/day (two divided doses) versus 2.25 g/day (three divided doses) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was the ulcerative colitis-disease activity index (UC-DAI) score before and after 8 weeks of treatment. The improvement of each individual UC-DAI variable, remission, and efficacy rates were secondary endpoints. Safety was determined by laboratory data, vital signs, subjective symptoms, and objective findings. RESULTS: Patients receiving 4 g/day achieved a change in UC-DAI score significantly superior to those receiving 2.25 g/day [-3.0 (95% confidence intervals (CI) -3.8 to -2.3) vs. -0.8 (95% CI -1.8 to 0.1), respectively]. There were significant differences in all UC-DAI variables between the groups. Remission rates were 22.0% (4 g/day) and 15.3% (2.25 g/day). The efficacy rate was significantly better with 4 versus 2.25 g/day [76.3 vs. 45.8%, respectively (95% CI 13.8-47.2); P = 0.001]. No difference was seen in adverse events or adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 4 g/day was significantly superior to 2.25 g/day in terms of UC-DAI score for patients with moderately active UC. Safety profiles were similar for both doses.
机译:背景与目的:口服美沙拉嗪制剂可有效治疗活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。目前尚不清楚美沙拉嗪的诱导剂量最适合治疗活动性UC患者。我们旨在评估4例相对于2.25 g /天的UC患者的疗效和安全性。方法:在39个日本医疗机构中进行的多中心,随机,双盲,平行组临床研究。总共123名中度活跃的UC患者接受了4克/天(两次分剂量)治疗,而接受了2.25克/天(三次分剂量)治疗8周。主要终点是治疗前后8周的溃疡性结肠炎疾病活性指数(UC-DAI)评分。次要终点是每个UC-DAI变量,缓解和疗效率的改善。通过实验室数据,生命体征,主观症状和客观发现确定安全性。结果:每天接受4 g的患者的UC-DAI评分变化明显优于接受每天2.25 g的患者[-3.0(95%置信区间(CI)-3.8至-2.3)与-0.8(95%CI) -1.8至0.1)]。两组之间所有UC-DAI变量均存在显着差异。缓解率分别为22.0%(4克/天)和15.3%(2.25克/天)。 4和2.25 g / day的疗效显着更好[分别为76.3和45.8%(95%CI 13.8-47.2); P = 0.001]。不良事件或药物不良反应未见差异。结论:中度活动性UC患者的UC-DAI评分在4 g /天的剂量下明显优于2.25 g /天。两种剂量的安全性相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号