...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastroenterology >Effect of lansoprazole versus roxatidine on prevention of bleeding and promotion of ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasia.
【24h】

Effect of lansoprazole versus roxatidine on prevention of bleeding and promotion of ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasia.

机译:兰索拉唑与罗沙替丁对预防浅表性胃肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术后出血和促进溃疡愈合的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been reported to be more useful than histamine-2 receptor antagonists for the prevention of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial gastric neoplasia. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole and the histamine-2 receptor antagonist roxatidine for the prevention of bleeding and the promotion of ulcer healing after ESD and to compare the cost-effectiveness of these two drugs. METHODS: The study subjects were 129 patients who underwent ESD for superficial gastric neoplasia. The patients were randomly assigned to the lansoprazole group (L group) or the roxatidine group (R group). Either drug was administered intravenously from the morning of the ESD day to the day after the ESD, followed by oral treatment for an additional 8 weeks. A second-look endoscopy was performed on the day after the ESD, and a repeat endoscopy was performed at 8 weeks after the ESD. The incidence of bleeding and the ulcer-healing rate at 8 weeks after the ESD were analyzed, as well as the total cost of treatment with these antisecretory agents. RESULTS: Three patients in each group were excluded from the analysis, leaving 62 patients in L group and 61 in R group. Two of the 62 patients (3.2%) in L group and three of the 61 patients (4.9%) in R group showed bleeding after ESD ; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.68). The ulcer-healing rate was 93.5% (58/62) in L group and 93.4% (57/61) in R group (P = 1). The total cost of treatment with the antisecretory agent from the day of the ESD to day 56 after the ESD was Yen 13,212 for lansoprazole and Yen 5,841 for roxatidine. CONCLUSIONS: Roxatidine appears to have high cost-effectiveness in the prevention of bleeding and in the promotion of ulcer healing after ESD for superficial gastric neoplasia.
机译:背景:据报道,质子泵抑制剂比组胺2受体拮抗剂在预防胃镜浅表性胃肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后出血方面更有用。这项研究的目的是评估质子泵抑制剂Lansoprazole和组胺2受体拮抗剂roxatidine在ESD后预防出血和促进溃疡愈合方面的作用,并比较这两种药物的成本效益。方法:研究对象为129例因浅表性胃肿瘤而接受ESD治疗的患者。将患者随机分为兰索拉唑组(L组)或罗沙替丁组(R组)。从ESD日的早晨到ESD后的第二天,静脉内给药,然后再口服治疗8周。在ESD发生后的第二天进行第二次内窥镜检查,在ESD发生后的8周再次进行内窥镜检查。分析了ESD后8周的出血发生率和溃疡愈合率,以及使用这些抗分泌剂治疗的总费用。结果:每组3例被排除在分析之外,L组62例,R组61例。 L组62例中的2例(3.2%)和R组61例中的3例(4.9%)发生ESD后出血;两组之间无显着差异(P = 0.68)。 L组溃疡愈合率为93.5%(58/62),R组溃疡愈合率为93.4%(57/61)(P = 1)。从ESD发生之日至ESD发生后第56天,使用抗分泌剂治疗的总费用对于兰索拉唑为13212日元,对罗沙替丁为5841日元。结论:罗沙替丁在预防出血和促进浅表性胃肿瘤的ESD后溃疡愈合方面具有很高的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号