首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Pediatrics >The evidence for greater sensitivity of interferon-γ release assays compared to tuberculin skin test in diagnosing latent mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
【24h】

The evidence for greater sensitivity of interferon-γ release assays compared to tuberculin skin test in diagnosing latent mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

机译:与结核菌素皮肤试验相比,干扰素-γ释放试验在诊断潜伏性结核分枝杆菌感染中具有更高的敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In their recent meta-analysis, Ge et al1 assessed performance characteristics of interferon-y release assays (IGRA) in the diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children compared to tuberculin skin tests (TST) as reference standard. The authors arrived at the conclusion that IGRA are both more sensitive and more specific compared to TST and that (for T-SPOT. TB) pooled sensitivities and specificities indicated a "missed diagnosis rate" of 6.9% and "misdiagnosis rate" of 23.3%. The data of the authors, however, only provide some indirect evidence supporting their conclusions regarding sensitivity and specificity and certainly do not allow conclusions regarding missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis: Using the tuberculin skin test as a reference standard does not allow conclusions about its comparative sensitivity or specificity. To compare sensitivity and specificity of IGRA and TST would require a third measure as a "gold standard" and surrogates used are proximity to index case or for active tuberculosis culture positivity.
机译:Ge等[1]在最近的荟萃分析中,评估了干扰素γ释放测定(IGRA)在诊断儿童潜伏性结核分枝杆菌感染方面的性能特征,而结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)作为参考标准。作者得出的结论是,与TST相比,IGRA更加灵敏且更具特异性,并且(针对T-SPOT。TB)综合的敏感性和特异性表明“漏诊率”为6.9%,“误诊率”为23.3% 。但是,作者的数据仅提供了一些间接的证据来支持其关于敏感性和特异性的结论,当然也不允许得出有关漏诊或误诊的结论:使用结核菌素皮肤试验作为参考标准不能得出有关其比较敏感性或敏感性的结论。特异性。为了比较IGRA和TST的敏感性和特异性,需要采取第三项措施作为“金标准”,并且所使用的替代物接近指数病例或活动性结核病培养阳性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号