首页> 外文期刊>The Pediatric infectious disease journal >Commercial interferon gamma release assays compared to the tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in childhood contacts in the Gambia.
【24h】

Commercial interferon gamma release assays compared to the tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in childhood contacts in the Gambia.

机译:与结核菌素皮肤试验相比,商业性干扰素γ释放试验可用于诊断冈比亚儿童接触者中潜在的结核分枝杆菌感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: We compared the performance of tuberculin skin test (TST), Quantiferon-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT), and T-SPOT.TB in diagnosing latent tuberculosis (LTBI) among childhood TB contacts in a TB endemic setting with high BCG coverage. We evaluated the performance of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) and TST when combined in an algorithm. METHODS: Childhood contacts of newly diagnosed TB patients were tested with TST, QFT-GIT, and T-SPOT. The level of exposure in contacts was categorized according to whether they slept in the same room, same house, or a different house as the index case. For the evaluation of combined test performance, prior estimates for prevalence of latent TB were used in Bayesian models that assumed conditional dependence between tests. RESULTS: A total of 285 children were recruited. Overall, 26.5%, 33.0%, and 33.5% were positive for TST, T-SPOT, or QFT-GIT, respectively. All 3 tests responded to the gradient of sleeping proximity to the index case. Neither TST nor IGRA results were confounded by BCG vaccination. There was moderate agreement (kappa = 0.40-0.68) between all 3 tests. Combination of either IGRA with TST increased sensitivity (by 9.3%-9.6%) especially in contacts in the highest exposure category but was associated with loss of specificity (9.9%-11.3%). CONCLUSION: IGRAs and TST are similar in their diagnostic performance for LTBI. An approximate 10% sensitivity benefit for using the TST and an IGRA in combination is associated with a slightly greater specificity loss. Testing strategies combining an IGRA and TST with an "or" statement may be useful only in situations where there is a high pretest probability of latent infection.
机译:背景:我们比较了结核病流行环境中儿童结核病接触者的结核菌素皮肤试验(TST),Quantiferon-TB金管内(QFT-GIT)和T-SPOT.TB在诊断潜伏性结核(LTBI)方面的表现。高卡介苗覆盖率。当结合算法时,我们评估了干扰素γ释放测定(IGRA)和TST的性能。方法:使用TST,QFT-GIT和T-SPOT对新诊断的TB患者的儿童接触进行了测试。接触者的暴露水平根据与索引病例是否在同一房间,同一房屋或不同房屋中睡觉而分类。为了评估组合测试的性能,在假设测试之间有条件依赖性的贝叶斯模型中使用了潜在结核病患病率的先前估计值。结果:总共招募了285名儿童。总体而言,TST,T-SPOT或QFT-GIT阳性分别为26.5%,33.0%和33.5%。所有3个测试均对睡眠接近指标情况的梯度做出了响应。卡介苗接种既没有混淆TST也没有IGRA结果。所有3个测试之间的一致性均中等(kappa = 0.40-0.68)。两种IGRA与TST的组合均可提高敏感性(提高9.3%-9.6%),尤其是在接触最高的类别中,但与特异性降低(9.9%-11.3%)相关。结论:IGRA和TST在LTBI的诊断性能上相似。结合使用TST和IGRA可获得约10%的灵敏度提高,而特异性损失则稍大。将IGRA和TST与“或”语句结合使用的测试策略仅在潜在感染的预测可能性很高的情况下才有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号