...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of glaucoma >Longitudinal evaluation of optic disc measurement variability with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
【24h】

Longitudinal evaluation of optic disc measurement variability with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

机译:通过光学相干断层扫描和共聚焦扫描激光检眼镜对光盘测量变异性进行纵向评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the longitudinal variability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) optic disc measurements. METHODS: A total of 25 normal and 50 glaucomatous eyes from 75 subjects were included in the analysis. The optic disc was measured by OCT and CSLO. Three separate measurements collected over an average period of 8.5+/-0.9 months were used to evaluate reproducibility. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between age, refraction, diagnosis (glaucoma or normal), visual field mean deviation, optic disc area, signal strength variance (OCT), optic disc area variance (OCT), image quality SD (CSLO), reference height variance (CSLO), and rim area variability. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient of optic disc measurements (except for optic disc area) ranged between 0.86 and 0.95 for OCT and between 0.89 and 0.96 for CSLO. The intraclass correlation coefficient for rim area measurement was significantly higher in CSLO (0.95) than that of OCT (0.86, P<0.001). After adjustment for other predictors, optic disc area variance and reference height variance were the most important factors responsible for rim area variability in OCT and CSLO, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although both OCT and CSLO have relatively low variability for optic disc measurements, CSLO demonstrates higher measurement reproducibility for rim area compared with OCT. Variations of disc area in OCT and reference height in CSLO constituted a significant proportion of the rim area variability during longitudinal assessment.
机译:目的:评估和比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和共焦扫描激光检眼镜(CSLO)光盘测量的纵向变异性。方法:来自75名受试者的总共25只正常眼和50只青光眼眼被纳入分析。通过OCT和CSLO测量视盘。在平均8.5 +/- 0.9个月的时间内收集了三个独立的测量值,以评估可重复性。进行单因素和多元回归分析以评估年龄,验光,诊断(青光眼或正常),视野平均偏差,视盘面积,信号强度方差(OCT),视盘面积方差(OCT),图像质量SD之间的关联(CSLO),参考高度差异(CSLO)和轮辋面积差异。结果:对于OCT,视盘测量的类内相关系数(视盘面积除外)在0.86至0.95之间,对于CSLO在0.89至0.96之间。 CSLO中用于轮辋面积测量的类内相关系数(0.95)显着高于OCT(0.86,P <0.001)。调整其他预测因子后,视盘面积差异和参考高度差异分别是导致OCT和CSLO边缘区域差异的最重要因素。结论:尽管OCT和CSLO的视盘测量变异性相对较低,但与OCT相比,CSLO的边缘区域测量再现性更高。 OCT的椎间盘面积变化和CSLO的参考高度变化在纵向评估过程中占边缘区域变异性的很大比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号