...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forest Economics >Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: application to forest biodiversity.
【24h】

Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: application to forest biodiversity.

机译:或有价值评估中的样本选择偏差模型:应用于森林生物多样性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this article, we use two formats of contingent valuation (CV) questions to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) for maintaining biodiversity in forests: the dichotomous choice (DC) or referendum format and the open-ended (OE) question. A large population of French households were surveyed nationwide by phone. The sample of respondents was later divided into two subsamples: people who have recreational activities in forests and those who do not. This dichotomy potentially biases WTP as the decision to have recreational activities in forests is endogenous. We estimate a Probit model with sample selection to correct this bias in the DC question. With the OE question, a second source of selection bias related to non-random censoring is present: some respondents are unwilling to pay. We use an extension of Heckman's approach to the double selection problem. The empirical application shows that ignoring these sample selection problems leads to biased estimates of mean WTP for biodiversity in a national survey for France.
机译:在本文中,我们使用两种形式的或有价值评估(CV)问题来激发支付意愿(WTP)以维护森林中的生物多样性:二分选择(DC)或全民投票形式以及开放式(OE)问题。通过电话在全国范围内对大量法国家庭进行了调查。后来,受访者样本被分为两个子样本:在森林中从事娱乐活动的人和没有森林活动的人。这种二分法可能会使WTP产生偏差,因为在森林中进行娱乐活动的决定是内生的。我们用样本选择来估计Probit模型,以纠正DC问题中的这种偏差。对于OE问题,存在与非随机审查相关的选择偏见的第二个来源:一些受访者不愿付款。我们对双重选择问题使用了Heckman方法的扩展。实证研究表明,在法国的一次全国调查中,忽略这些样本选择问题会导致对生物多样性平均WTP的估计偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号