首页> 外文学位 >Geographic differences in contingent valuation survey responses: An application to forest fire prevention programs in United States of America and Vietnam.
【24h】

Geographic differences in contingent valuation survey responses: An application to forest fire prevention programs in United States of America and Vietnam.

机译:或有评估调查的地域差异:美国和越南在森林防火计划中的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Benefit measures are helpful in designing efficient environmental policy, and the question on how to determine benefit measures is a major concern for environmental economists. Because of this, the use of these measures in benefit transfers from one study area to another has become prevalent in policy analysis.; The first purpose of this study is to find out how much residents in the three very distinct states of California, Florida and Montana, support prescribed burning and mechanical fire fuel reduction techniques through a contingent valuation method. We test whether the willingness to pay per household is similar or not and whether the willingness to pay functions are transferable between three states. The next purpose is to test whether willingness to pay for fire fuel reduction programs is sensitive to acreage reduction or not. Finally, we investigate the feasibility of applying contingent valuation method to value forest fire prevention in Vietnam.; Available data reveal that from 70% to 98% of people agreed to pay the proposed bid amounts and that fire fuel reduction programs are highly supported in three states of California (CA), Florida (FL) and Montana (MT). With Chi-square test, we found that response rates of white and Hispanic people for support of prescribed burning and MT in the pattern of protest and non protest reasons for refusing to pay for these programs. White people in CA, FL and MT have the means of willingness to pay of {dollar}416.95, {dollar}305.04, {dollar}328.08 for prescribed burning program and {dollar}402.97, {dollar}229.74, {dollar}207.94 for mechanical fire fuel reduction program, respectively. For Hispanic people, the means of willingness to pay for prescribed burning program in California and Florida are {dollar}991.84 and {dollar}393.36 and for mechanical fire fuel reduction program. The mean of willingness to pay of {dollar}397.5 has been found for Florida. With wide confidence intervals, willingness to pay by white and Hispanic people in three states is similar to each other and these willingness to pay functions are transferable among these states. The contingent valuation method is applicable to the forest fire prevention program in Vietnam context with working days contribution. Money willingness to pay is found to be unrealistic for this program.
机译:利益衡量标准有助于设计有效的环境政策,而如何确定利益衡量标准的问题是环境经济学家的主要关切。因此,在政策分析中,在从一个研究区到另一个研究区的利益转移中使用这些措施已经变得很普遍。这项研究的第一个目的是找出在加利福尼亚,佛罗里达和蒙大拿州这三个截然不同的州中有多少居民通过或有估值法来支持规定的燃烧和机械燃烧燃料减少技术。我们测试每个家庭的支付意愿是否相似,以及支付功能的意愿是否可以在三个州之间转移。下一个目的是测试为减少燃料减少计划付费的意愿是否对减少耕地敏感。最后,我们研究了采用或有评估法对越南森林防火进行评估的可行性。现有数据显示,有70%至98%的人同意支付建议的投标价,并且加利福尼亚(CA),佛罗里达(FL)和蒙大拿州(MT)的三个州都大力支持减少燃油消耗计划。通过卡方检验,我们发现白人和西班牙裔人对拒绝处方药和MT的抗议和非抗议原因支持了处方烧伤和MT。 CA,FL和MT的白人愿意为指定的刻录程序支付{dollar} 416.95,{dollar} 305.04,{dollar} 328.08和{dollar} 402.97,{dollar} 229.74,{dollar} 207.94机械减燃计划。对于西班牙裔人来说,愿意为加利福尼亚和佛罗里达州的指定燃烧计划付费的方法为{991.84美元}和{393.36美元},以及为减少机械式燃油削减计划而支付的费用。佛罗里达的平均支付意愿为397.5美元。在较宽的置信区间内,三个州的白人和西班牙裔人的支付意愿彼此相似,并且这些支付功能的意愿在这两个州之间可以转移。或有估值法适用于越南背景下有工作日贡献的森林防火计划。人们发现,对于该计划,金钱支付意愿是不现实的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Le, Hung Trong.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.; Agriculture Forestry and Wildlife.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 207 p.
  • 总页数 207
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业经济;森林生物学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号