首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates
【24h】

Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates

机译:宫颈癌筛查:对历史患者依从性和人群信息学的前瞻性队列研究提示筛查率的提高

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to assess the impact of historical screening compliance with the effectiveness of patient reminder letters on cervical cancer screening rates. Method Using population-based informatics systems, women with no cervical cancer screening in the prior 3 years were identified in two primary care clinics, Mayo Family Clinic Northeast (NE; n?=?1613) and Northwest (NW; n?=?1088). Patients were divided into two compliance groups: overdue/unknown screening status at study start or previously compliant. The NE Clinic sent reminder letters over a 6 months window to patients eligible for screening at the study start or during the study that were also identified as employees/dependents (E/D). There were 795 intervention (NE Clinic E/D patients) and 1906 control subjects. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, differences in screening rates were assessed. Results A higher unadjusted screening rate was observed for the E/D group than the non-E/D group at both sites (32.7 versus 18.2% at NW, P?
机译:目的和目的本研究的目的是评估历史筛查依从性以及患者提醒信对宫颈癌筛查率的影响。方法使用基于人口的信息学系统,在两家梅奥家庭诊所东北(NE; n = 1613)和西北(NW; n = 1088)的两个初级保健诊所中,确定了在过去3年中未进行子宫颈癌筛查的妇女。 )。将患者分为两个依从组:研究开始时的过期/未知筛查状态或先前依从。 NE诊所在6个月的窗口内向在研究开始时或研究期间有资格进行筛查且也被确定为雇员/家属(E / D)的患者发送了提醒函。有795例干预措施(NE临床E / D患者)和1906例对照对象。使用意向治疗分析,评估筛查率的差异。结果E / D组在两个部位的未调整筛查率均高于非E / D组(NW为32.7对18.2%,P 0.001; NE为39.0对14.7%,P 0.001。 0.001)。对于依从历史的人群,接受信件的人(NE的E / D受试者)的未调整筛查率高于未接受信件的人(NW的E / D受试者; 56.1对44.5%,P = 0.01)。逾期/未知组的E / D科目在NE(收到的字母)和NW(无字母)之间没有观察到差异(27.4%对25.9%,P≥0.62)。顺应性(24.2 vs 30.6%,P≥0.18)和逾期/未知组(11.9)在NE和NW(无人收到信件)的非E / D受试者的筛查率上没有差异。对比13.0%,P?=?0.59)。多变量logistic回归模型显示出E / D状态(P <= 0.006),依从性组(P 0.001)以及临床部位与E / D状态之间的交互作用(P <= 0.04)有显着的总体影响。 。结论在有参保妇女中,对于有筛查依从性史的女性,提醒函似乎可以提高宫颈癌的筛查率。如果筛查逾期,提醒信似乎不足以激励女性。需要进一步调查逾期未进行筛查的妇女群体,以制定干预措施,以成功地针对这一群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号