首页> 外文期刊>Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology >Fine organic particulate matter dominates indoor-generated PM2.5 in RIOPA homes.
【24h】

Fine organic particulate matter dominates indoor-generated PM2.5 in RIOPA homes.

机译:细有机颗粒物占RIOPA房屋室内产生的PM2.5的主导。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Residential indoor and outdoor fine particle (PM(2.5)) organic (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations (48 h) were measured at 173 homes in Houston, TX, Los Angeles County, CA, and Elizabeth, NJ as part of the Relationship of Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) study. The adsorption of organic vapors on the quartz fiber sampling filter (a positive artifact) was substantial indoors and out, accounting for 36% and 37% of measured OC at the median indoor (8.2 microg C/m(3)) and outdoor (5.0 microg C/m(3)) OC concentrations, respectively. Uncorrected, adsorption artifacts would lead to substantial overestimation of particulate OC both indoors and outdoors. After artifact correction, the mean particulate organic matter (OM=1.4 OC) concentration indoors (9.8 microg/m(3)) was twice the mean outdoor concentration (4.9 microg/m(3)). The mean EC concentration was 1.1 microg/m(3) both indoors and outdoors. OM accounted for 29%, 30% and 29% of PM(2.5) mass outdoors and 48%, 55% and 61% of indoor PM(2.5)mass in Los Angeles Co., Elizabeth and Houston study homes, respectively. Indirect evidence provided by species mass balance results suggests that PM(2.5) nitrate (not measured) was largely lost during outdoor-to-indoor transport, as reported by Lunden et al. This results in dramatic changes with outdoor-to-indoor transport in the mass and composition of ambient-generated PM(2.5) at California homes. On average, 71% to 76% of indoor OM was emitted or formed indoors, calculated by (1) Random Component Superposition (RCS) model and (2) non-linear fit of OC and air exchange rate data to the mass balance model. Assuming that all particles penetrate indoors (P=1) and there is no particle loss indoors (k=0), a lower bound estimate of 41% of indoor OM was indoor-generated (mean). OM appears to be the predominant species in indoor-generated PM(2.5), based on species mass balance results. Particulate OM emitted or formed indoors is substantial enough to alter the concentration, composition and behavior of indoor PM(2.5). One interesting effect of increased indoor OM concentrations is a shift in the gas-particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the gas to the particle phase with outdoor-to-indoor transport.
机译:作为该计划的一部分,在德克萨斯州休斯顿市,加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县和新泽西州伊丽莎白市的173处房屋中测量了住宅室内和室外细颗粒(PM(2.5))有机(OC)和元素碳(EC)浓度(48小时)室内,室外和个人空气之间的关系(RIOPA)研究。石英纤维采样过滤器(正伪影)上的有机蒸气在室内和室外都有大量吸附,分别在室内(8.2 microg C / m(3))和室外(5.0)的中值OC的测量值分别为36%和37% microg C / m(3))OC浓度。未经校正的吸附伪影将导致室内和室外的颗粒OC明显被高估。经过伪影校正后,室内平均颗粒有机物(OM = 1.4 OC)浓度(9.8 microg / m(3))是室外平均浓度(4.9 microg / m(3))的两倍。室内和室外的平均EC浓度为1.1 microg / m(3)。 OM分别占洛杉矶公司,伊丽莎白和休斯顿学习住宅中室外PM(2.5)质量的29%,30%和29%,以及室内PM(2.5)质量的48%,55%和61%。物种质量平衡结果提供的间接证据表明,在室外到室内的运输过程中,硝酸PM(2.5)硝酸盐(未测量)大量损失。这导致加利福尼亚州家庭中从室外到室内运输的环境产生的PM(2.5)的质量和成分发生了巨大变化。通过(1)随机成分叠加(RCS)模型和(2)OC和空气交换率数据对质量平衡模型的非线性拟合计算得出,平均而言,室内OM的71%至76%是在室内发出或形成的。假设所有粒子都穿透室内(P = 1),而室内没有粒子丢失(k = 0),则室内产生的室内OM的下限估计值为41%(平均值)。根据物种质量平衡的结果,OM似乎是室内生成的PM(2.5)中的主要物种。在室内排放或形成的颗粒状有机物足以改变室内PM(2.5)的浓度,组成和行为。室内OM浓度增加的一个有趣的影响是,多环芳烃(PAH)在气体中的分配从室外到室内,从气相转移到颗粒相。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号