...
【24h】

100 Years ago more or less

机译:100年前或多或少

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RBH Note: This price list stresses the point that the number six strength cap should be used with all high explosives. It's interesting that duPont chose to continue to supply the lesser strength caps - but lowered the price of the #5 or #6 to be closer to that of the #4 and #3.There were imports of the lower strength caps at the time that had to be competed against, hence the price reductions. Another interesting point on this price list is the noting on the "Red Cross Explosives" page that these explosives reduce the danger incurred during the operation of thawing. As noted many times in these articles, this problem was not to be solved for about another 16 years or so.
机译:RBH注意:此价格表强调了所有强度较高的炸药均应使用第六强度上限的观点。有趣的是,杜邦选择继续提供强度较低的瓶盖-但将#5或#6的价格降低至与#4和#3的价格更接近。必须与之竞争,因此降低了价格。该价目表上的另一个有趣的地方是“红十字爆炸物”页面上的注释,这些爆炸物减少了解冻过程中发生的危险。正如这些文章中多次提到的那样,这个问题大约要再过16年才能解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号