...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology >Reliability of a semi-quantitative method for dermal exposure assessment (DREAM).
【24h】

Reliability of a semi-quantitative method for dermal exposure assessment (DREAM).

机译:皮肤暴露评估(DREAM)的半定量方法的可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Valid and reliable semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment methods for epidemiological research and for occupational hygiene practice, applicable for different chemical agents, are practically nonexistent. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of a recently developed semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment method (DREAM) by (i) studying inter-observer agreement, (ii) assessing the effect of individual observers on dermal exposure estimates for different tasks, and (iii) comparing inter-observer agreement for ranking of body parts according to their exposure level. Four studies were performed in which a total of 29 observers (mainly occupational hygienists) were asked to fill in DREAM while performing side-by-side observations for different tasks, comprising dermal exposures to liquids, solids, and vapors. Intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.68 to 0.87 for total dermal exposure estimates, indicating good to excellent inter-observer agreement. The effects of individual observers on task estimates were estimated using a linear mixed effect model with logged DREAM estimates as explanatory variable; "task", company/department company/department Geometric mean (GM) dermal exposure estimates for different tasks were estimated by taking the exponent of the predicted betas for the tasks. By taking the exponent of the predicted observer's intercept (exp(omega i)), a multiplier (M(O)) was estimated for each observer. The effects of individual observers on task estimates were relatively small, as the maximum predicted mean observers' multiplier was only a factor 2, while predicted GMs of dermal exposure estimates for tasks ranged from 0 to 1226, and none of the predicted individual observers' multipliers differed significantly from 1 (t-test alpha = 0.05). Inter-observer agreement for ranking of dermal exposure of nine body parts was moderate to good, as median values of Spearman correlation coefficients for pairs of observers ranged from 0.29 to 0.93. DREAM provides reproducible results for a broad range of tasks with dermal exposures to liquids, solids, as well as vapors. DREAM appears to offer a useful advance for estimations of dermal exposure both for epidemiological research and for occupational hygiene practice.
机译:几乎没有适用于流行病学研究和职业卫生实践的有效且可靠的半定量皮肤接触评估方法,该方法适用于不同的化学制剂。这项研究的目的是通过(i)研究观察者之间的共识,(ii)评估各个观察者对不同任务对皮肤接触估计的影响,来评估最近开发的半定量皮肤接触评估方法(DREAM)的可靠性。 ;以及(iii)根据观察者之间的接触程度比较观察者之间的共识,以对身体部位进行排名。进行了四项研究,其中总共29位观察员(主要是职业卫生学家)被要求填写DREAM,同时对不同的任务进行并排观察,包括皮肤接触液体,固体和蒸气。对于总的皮肤接触估计,类内相关系数在0.68到0.87之间,表明观察者之间的一致性很好。使用线性混合效应模型以记录的DREAM估计值作为解释变量来估计单个观察员对任务估计值的影响;公司/部门公司/部门的“任务”,通过采用任务的预测beta指数来估算不同任务的几何平均值(GM)皮肤接触估计。通过采用预测的观察者的截距的指数(exp(omega i)),为每个观察者估计一个乘数(M(O))。个体观察者对任务估计的影响相对较小,因为最大预测平均观察者乘数仅是2因子,而皮肤暴露估计的预测GM预测值介于0到1226之间,并且没有一个个体预测观察者的乘数与1的差异显着(t检验alpha = 0.05)。观察者之间对九个身体部位皮肤接触的排名的共识是中度到良好的,因为成对的观察者对的Spearman相关系数的中位数介于0.29至0.93之间。 DREAM在皮肤暴露于液体,固体和蒸气的情况下,可为各种任务提供可重复的结果。对于流行病学研究和职业卫生实践,DREAM似乎为估计皮肤接触提供了有用的进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号