...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forest research >Efficiency of extracting microarthropods from the canopy litter in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantation: a comparison between the washing and Tullgren methods
【24h】

Efficiency of extracting microarthropods from the canopy litter in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantation: a comparison between the washing and Tullgren methods

机译:从日本雪松(Cryptomeria japonica D. Don)人工林冠层凋落物中提取节肢动物的效率:洗涤法与Tullgren法之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the efficiency of washing versus the Tullgren method for extracting microarthropods from dead leaves and branches in the canopy of Cryptomeria japonica trees. Oribatida and Collembola were consistently the numerically dominant taxa of microarthropods, but the relative abundance differed between the two extraction methods. Oribatida accounted for more than 70% of all the microarthropods collected by the washing method but less than 30% by the Tullgren method. Collembola accounted for less than 10% collected by the washing method but about 60% by the Tullgren method. The density of Oribatida was higher when collected by the washing method than by the Tullgren method, and vice versa for the density of Collembola. Our results suggest that the washing method is appropriate for collecting Oribatida and other microarthropods, whereas the Tullgren method is better for collecting Collembola from the canopy litter of C. japonica trees.
机译:我们比较了洗涤和Tullgren方法从柳杉柳冠层的枯叶和树枝中提取微节肢动物的效率。 Oribatida和Collembola始终是微型节肢动物的数字优势类群,但两种提取方法之间的相对丰度有所不同。通过洗涤方法收集的所有节肢动物中,折叶纲占70%以上,而通过Tullgren方法则占不到30%。 Collembola的洗涤方法收集的少于10%,而Tullgren方法收集的大约60%。通过洗涤方法收集的Oribatida的密度高于通过Tullgren方法收集的Oribatida的密度,反之,Collembola的密度反之亦然。我们的结果表明,该洗涤方法适合于收集稻蚜科和其他节肢动物,而Tullgren方法则更适合于从日本粳稻冠层凋落物中收集Collembola。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号