...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rheumatology >Comparison of the performance of the different classification criteria for primary Sj?gren’s syndrome: a prospective cohort study
【24h】

Comparison of the performance of the different classification criteria for primary Sj?gren’s syndrome: a prospective cohort study

机译:比较不同分类标准对原发性干燥综合征的表现:一项前瞻性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of the study is to compare the longitudinal performance of different classification criteria for primary Sj?gren’s syndrome (SS) in a cohort of patients previously diagnosed with primary SS. In each patient, we repeated diagnostic tests as required by the Copenhagen, European, Californian, and American-European Consensus Group (AECG) or the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. Sixty-three out of 90 eligible patients (70 %) consented to participate. During the follow-up (mean (standard deviation, SD) 7.6 years (0.5)), we observed evolution from primary SS to SS with another systemic autoimmune disease (SAD) in 9/63 (14 %) patients, on average after 4.0 years (SD 0.9). The evolution from primary SS to SS-SADs was significantly more common if the diagnosis of primary SS was initially made using AECG (17 %, p = 0.008) or ACR (16 %, p = 0.016) criteria. In the 34 patients who underwent a full diagnostic reassessment, the diagnosis retention rate was statistically significant for all the criteria, except the European criteria. At reassessment, 3/32 (9 %) patients initially diagnosed as having primary SS using the European criteria could not be classified as having primary SS by any of the criteria. The differences in classification when using the AECG and the new ACR criteria were not statistically significant. The longitudinal diagnosis retention rate was highest for the Californian and AECG criteria. Regardless of the classification criteria, some patients eventually develop another SAD.
机译:这项研究的目的是在一组先前被诊断为原发性SS的患者中比较原发性干燥综合征(SS)的不同分类标准的纵向表现。我们按照哥本哈根,欧洲,加利福尼亚和美国-欧洲共识小组(AECG)或新的美国风湿病学会(ACR)分类标准的要求,对每位患者进行了重复的诊断测试。 90名合格患者中有63名(70%)同意参加。在随访期间(平均(标准差,SD)7.6年(0.5)),我们观察到9/63(14%)患者从原发性SS演变为具有另一种系统性自身免疫病(SAD)的SS,平均4.0后年(SD 0.9)。如果最初使用AECG(17%,p = 0.008)或ACR(16%,p = 0.016)标准诊断原发性SS,则从原发性SS演变为SS-SAD的可能性明显更高。在34位接受了全面诊断性重新评估的患者中,除欧洲标准外,所有标准的诊断保留率在统计学上均具有统计学意义。重新评估时,根据欧洲标准,最初被诊断为原发性SS的3/32(9%)患者不能被任何标准归类为原发性SS。使用AECG和新的ACR标准时,分类上的差异在统计学上不显着。纵向诊断保留率在加利福尼亚州和AECG标准中最高。无论分类标准如何,某些患者最终都会发展出另一种SAD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号