...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic and legal medicine >Assessment of abuse-related injuries: a comparative study of forensic physicians, emergency room physicians, emergency room nurses and medical students.
【24h】

Assessment of abuse-related injuries: a comparative study of forensic physicians, emergency room physicians, emergency room nurses and medical students.

机译:评估与虐待有关的伤害:对法医,急诊室医师,急诊室护士和医学生的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparative study was made investigating whether emergency room physicians, emergency room nurses, forensic physicians, and interns are competent in describing, recognising and determining the possible cause of injuries. The injury assessment scores varied from good--adequate--fail and remained blank in various participant groups. Forensic physicians scored significantly better than emergency room staff and interns in the assessment of abuse-related injuries. There were almost no differences noted between emergency room physicians and emergency room nurses. For the functional group with more or less than 4 to 6 years of experience, no significant differences were noted for scoring good in all 5 cases. The fact that forensic physicians scored better than the emergency room staff is probably explained by the fact that almost all practicing forensic physicians have been officially qualified. Training in this field for all professionals involved in such assessment should be mandatory.
机译:进行了一项比较研究,调查急诊室医师,急诊室护士,法医和实习生是否有能力描述,识别和确定伤害的可能原因。伤害评估得分从良好(合格)到失败(不合格)不等,并且在各个参与者组中保持空白。在评估与虐待相关的伤害方面,法医医师的得分明显高于急诊室工作人员和实习生。急诊室医师和急诊室护士之间几乎没有差异。对于经验丰富或少于4至6年的功能组,所有5例患者的评分均未发现明显差异。法医医师比急诊室工作人员得分更高的事实,可能是因为几乎所有执业法医医师都具有正式资格。必须为所有参与此类评估的专业人员在这一领域进行培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号