首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Laboratory Science: Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology >Platelet function testing: auditing local practice and broader implications.
【24h】

Platelet function testing: auditing local practice and broader implications.

机译:血小板功能测试:审核当地实践和更广泛的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Platelet function testing is a common test procedure used for assessing patients with mucocutaneous bruising and/or bleeding and for monitoring anti-platelet therapy. However, standardization of practice is poorly applied, and experts differ on several aspects of its application. OBJECTIVE: This study reports on a local audit of current practice in consideration of recent reports, expert opinion and current CLSI guidelines. METHODS: We undertook an assessment of our laboratory test practice for light transmission aggregometry (LTA) as a diagnostic screening process for platelet function, as well as performance of PFA-100 closure times used for screening primary haemostasis. For LTA testing, we wished to assess the validity or otherwise of platelet count adjustments using autologous platelet poor plasma (PPP), as used by some experts and as also recommended by the current CLSI guidelines for performance of platelet aggregation. For PFA-100 testing, we assessed the effect of different blood collection tubes. RESULTS: For most test cases undergoing LTA, platelet count adjustment using autologous PPP resulted in considerable diminution of detectable platelet function using several agonists, and in particular collagen, ADP and epinephrine. These effects could result in differing conclusions regarding the likelihood or severity of a platelet function disorder. For the PFA-100, different blood collection tubes resulted in slightly different closure times that could also potentially influence the conclusion of 'normality' or otherwise for investigated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This audit of local practice indicates that the process of platelet count adjustment using autologous PPP provides adverse outcomes related to identification of platelet dysfunction. Accordingly, we recommend that all laboratories validate this practice if used at their facility. For PFA-100 testing, local validation of the normal reference range is required according to local conditions and collection practice. Otherwise, laboratories may inappropriately identify platelet function disorders when these may not exist.
机译:背景:血小板功能测试是一种常见的测试程序,用于评估患有粘膜皮肤瘀伤和/或出血的患者以及监测抗血小板治疗。但是,实践的标准化应用很少,专家在其应用的几个方面存在分歧。目的:本研究报告考虑到最近的报告,专家意见和当前的CLSI指南,对当前实践进行了本地审核。方法:我们对透光聚集法(LTA)的实验室测试实践进行了评估,以作为血小板功能的诊断性筛选过程,以及用于筛选主要止血的PFA-100封闭时间的表现。对于LTA测试,我们希望使用一些专家使用的血小板自体贫血血浆(PPP)来评估血小板计数调整的有效性或其他方法,以及当前CLSI指南中建议的血小板聚集性能。对于PFA-100测试,我们评估了不同采血管的效果。结果:对于大多数接受LTA的测试病例,使用自体PPP调整血小板计数会导致使用多种激动剂(尤其是胶原蛋白,ADP和肾上腺素)可检测到的血小板功能大大降低。这些作用可能导致关于血小板功能障碍的可能性或严重性的不同结论。对于PFA-100,不同的采血管导致闭合时间略有不同,这也可能会影响“正常”结论或对被调查患者的结论。结论:对当地实践的审核表明,使用自体PPP进行血小板计数调整的过程提供了与识别血小板功能障碍相关的不良结果。因此,我们建议所有实验室在其实验室中使用时均应验证此做法。对于PFA-100测试,需要根据当地条件和收集实践对正常参考范围进行本地验证。否则,实验室可能不适当地识别血小板功能障碍,而这些疾病可能不存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号