首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forecasting >Nelson-siegel, affine and quadratic yield curve specifications: Which one is better at forecasting? (Review)
【24h】

Nelson-siegel, affine and quadratic yield curve specifications: Which one is better at forecasting? (Review)

机译:Nelson-siegel,仿射和二次方收益率曲线规格:哪一种预测效果更好? (评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we compare the in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting performance of no-arbitrage quadratic, essentially affine and dynamic Nelson-Siegel term structure models. In total, 11 model variants are evaluated, comprising five quadratic, four affine and two Nelson-Siegel models. Recursive re-estimation and out-of-sample 1-, 6- and 12-month-ahead forecasts are generated and evaluated using monthly US data for yields observed at maturities of 1, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. Our results indicate that quadratic models provide the best in-sample fit, while the best out-of-sample performance is generated by three-factor affine models and the dynamic Nelson-Siegel model variants. Statistical tests fail to identify one single best forecasting model class.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了无套利二次,基本仿射和动态Nelson-Siegel期限结构模型的样本内拟合和样本外预测性能。总共评估了11种模型变体,包括5个二次模型,4个仿射模型和2个Nelson-Siegel模型。使用美国每月数据,针对在1、6、12、24、60和120个月到期时观察到的收益,生成并评估递归重估和样本外提前1、6和12个月的预测。我们的结果表明,二次模型提供了最佳的样本内拟合,而最佳的样本外性能是由三因素仿射模型和动态Nelson-Siegel模型变体生成的。统计测试无法确定一个最佳预测模型类别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号