...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Shared Cognitive Processes Underlying Past and Future Thinking: The Impact of Imagery and Concurrent Task Demands on Event Specfficity.
【24h】

Shared Cognitive Processes Underlying Past and Future Thinking: The Impact of Imagery and Concurrent Task Demands on Event Specfficity.

机译:过去和未来思维背后的共同认知过程:图像和并发任务需求对事件专一性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent literature has argued that whereas remembering the past and imagining the future make use of shared cognitive substrates, simulating future events places heavier demands on executive resources. These propositions were explored in 3 experiments comparing the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on speed and accuracy of past event retrieval and future event simulation. Results provide support for the suggestion that both past' and future episodes can be constructed through 2 mechanisms: a noneffortful "direct" pathway and a controlled, effortful "generative" pathway. However, limited evidence emerged for the suggestion that simulating of future, compared with retrieving past, episodes places heavier demands on executive resources; only under certain conditions did it emerge as a more error prone and lengthier process. The findings are discussed in terms of how retrieval and simulation make use of the same cognitive substrates in subtly different ways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
机译:最近的文献认为,尽管记住过去并想象未来会利用共享的认知底物,但模拟未来事件对执行人员的资源提出了更高的要求。在3个实验中探索了这些命题,比较了图像和并发任务需求对过去事件检索和未来事件模拟的速度和准确性的影响。结果为过去和将来发作都可以通过两种机制构建的建议提供了支持:不费力的“直接”途径和可控的,费力的“生成”途径。但是,关于这一点的证据很少,与过去的情况相比,模拟未来对行政资源的需求更大。只有在某些条件下,它才会以更容易出错和更长的时间出现。根据检索和模拟如何以微妙不同的方式利用相同的认知底物来讨论这些发现。 [作者的摘要]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号