首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Psychology. General >Long-Term Working Memory and Transient Storage in Reading Comprehension: What Is the Evidence? Comment on Foroughi, Werner, Barragan, and Boehm-Davis (2015)
【24h】

Long-Term Working Memory and Transient Storage in Reading Comprehension: What Is the Evidence? Comment on Foroughi, Werner, Barragan, and Boehm-Davis (2015)

机译:阅读理解中的长期工作记忆和暂时性存储:证据是什么?评论Foroughi,Werner,Barragan和Boehm-Davis(2015)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a recent article, Foroughi, Werner, Barragan, and Boehm-Davis (2015) demonstrated that interspersing interruptions between paragraphs during reading sometimes reduces accuracy on comprehension questions. We propose an account of their findings within long-term working memory (LTWM) theory. Our account proposes that interruptions interfere with the accessibility of the generated encodings of the text in long-term memory (LTM) and that unimpaired continued comprehension requires restoration of access to these memory encodings during the resumption of reading after the interruptions. It is consistent with the accuracy of question answering being substantially preserved in their study, which is seemingly inconsistent with their transient storage account. This theoretical controversy does not diminish the importance of Foroughi et al.'s results: We agree that additional research is needed to understand when and how interruptions impact various aspects of comprehension.
机译:在最近的一篇文章中,Foroughi,Werner,Barragan和Boehm-Davis(2015)证明,阅读过程中段落之间的穿插中断有时会降低理解问题的准确性。我们建议在长期工作记忆(LTWM)理论中说明他们的发现。我们的观点提出,中断会干扰在长期存储器(LTM)中生成的文本编码的可访问性,并且无间断的持续理解要求在中断后恢复读取期间恢复对这些存储器编码的访问。这与他们的研究中基本上保留了问题回答的准确性是一致的,这似乎与他们的瞬态存储帐户不一致。这种理论上的争论并没有削弱Foroughi等人的研究结果的重要性:我们同意,需要进行更多的研究来理解中断何时以及如何影响理解的各个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号