...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Management in Regional Marine Governance? The Baltic Sea Context
【24h】

Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Management in Regional Marine Governance? The Baltic Sea Context

机译:在区域海洋治理中采用生态系统方法进行管理?波罗的海背景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Currently, European marine governance seems to be undergoing significant changes. From having been based largely on scientific expert knowledge, restricted risk assessments and governmental regulation, we are now witnessing a management turn towards holistic perspectives, the inclusion of stakeholders, adaptive governance, and coproduction of knowledge—the so-called ecosystem approach to management (EAM). By using the Baltic Sea as an example of these changes, we have taken a closer look at the 2007Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) of the Helsinki Commission and the recent organizational changes within the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). Informed by a Reflexive Governance perspective, the primary objective has been to analyse the extent to which institutional preconditions for using an EAM exist in these two cases. Our results show that even though the BSAP has been designed with an EAM approach as its core philosophy, existing implementation, financing, monitoring, and enforcement structures make it unlikely that actual management modes will change significantly in the near feature. Changes in the ICES have occurred as a result of an internal restructuring process characterized by integrative and learning elements. It has been shown that adopting a broad social science perspective and a reflexive governance viewpoint can elucidate how factors such as inadequate institutional change, limited cooperation over sector borders, and adjustment problems caused by path dependency can threaten the successful turn towards the EAM in marine governance.
机译:当前,欧洲海洋治理似乎正在发生重大变化。从很大程度上基于科学专家知识,有限的风险评估和政府法规开始,我们现在目睹了管理层转向整体观点,利益相关者的包容,适应性治理以及知识的联合生产(所谓的生态系统管理方法( EAM)。通过以波罗的海为例,我们仔细研究了赫尔辛基委员会的《 2007年波罗的海行动计划》(BSAP)以及国际海洋勘探理事会(ICES)最近的组织变更。根据反思性治理的观点,主要目标是分析在这两种情况下使用EAM的机构前提条件的程度。我们的结果表明,即使BSAP的设计已将EAM方法作为其核心理念,但现有的实施,融资,监控和执行结构使实际的管理模式不太可能在近期发生重大变化。由于具有整合和学习元素的内部重组过程,ICES发生了变化。研究表明,采用广泛的社会科学观点和反思性治理观点可以阐明诸如机构改革不足,跨部门边界合作有限以及路径依赖引起的调整问题等因素如何威胁到海洋治理向EAM的成功转变。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号