...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical transplantation. >Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus: post hoc analyses from three clinical trials.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus: post hoc analyses from three clinical trials.

机译:肠溶麦考酚酸钠对糖尿病肾移植患者的疗效和安全性:三项临床试验的事后分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To examine the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus, six- and 12-month data from three clinical trials with EC-MPS (Studies B301, B302, and myPROMS) were analyzed post hoc. Studies B301 (de novo patients) and B302 (maintenance patients) followed a randomized double-blind design whereas myPROMS was an open-label study in de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients in which all patients received EC-MPS as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. In studies B301 and B302, diabetic patients were compared against mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept), the reference drug. For myPROMS, data from diabetic and non-diabetic patients were compared. In total, 246 diabetic patients receiving EC-MPS were analyzed. In study B301, the efficacy failure rate [biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up] in diabetics at 12 months was 17.6% (EC-MPS) vs. 26.2% (MMF), and of BPAR alone 14.7% vs. 19.0% (both n.s.). In de novo patients from myPROMS, the treatment failure rate was similar in diabetic (20.3%) and non-diabetic patients (27.1%), as was the incidence of BPAR (17.7% vs. 23.1%, both n.s.). The overall incidence, severity and pattern of AEs were comparable between EC-MPS and MMF in de novo patients. This was supported by the safety results assessed in maintenance patients (B302) indicating no increased safety risk with the use of EC-MPS in the diabetic patient population, if compared with MMF. Likewise, apart from a higher incidence of severe/serious infections in diabetics, the safety profile of EC-MPS was not different to non-diabetics in myPROMS. In conclusion, preliminary data suggest that EC-MPS in combination with cyclosporine (+/- steroids) can be used efficiently and safely for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in diabetic renal transplant patients. Moreover, diabetic patients can apparently be safely converted from MMF to EC-MPS. More data from prospective studies are needed to fully judge the efficacy and safety profile of EC-MPS in the diabetic transplant population.
机译:为检查肠溶性麦考酚酸钠(EC-MPS,myfortic)在糖尿病肾移植患者中的有效性和安全性,来自三个EC-MPS临床试验(研究B301,B302和myPROMS)的六个月和十二个月数据)进行事后分析。研究B301(新生患者)和B302(维持患者)遵循随机双盲设计,而myPROMS是一项针对新生和维持性肾移植患者的开放标签研究,其中所有患者均接受EC-MPS作为其免疫抑制方案的一部分。在研究B301和B302中,将糖尿病患者与麦考酚酸酯(MMF,CellCept)(参考药物)进行了比较。对于myPROMS,比较了来自糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的数据。总共分析了246名接受EC-MPS的糖尿病患者。在研究B301中,糖尿病患者在12个月时的功效失败率[活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR),移植物丢失,死亡或随访损失)为17.6%(EC-MPS)对26.2%(MMF),和单独的BPAR分别为14.7%和19.0%(均为ns)。在使用myPROMS的从头开始的患者中,糖尿病(20.3%)和非糖尿病患者(27.1%)的治疗失败率相似,BPAR的发生率相似(分别为17.7%和23.1%,两者均为n.s.)。从头开始,EC-MPS和MMF在AEs的总体发生率,严重性和模式方面可比。在维持患者中评估的安全性结果(B302)证明了这一点,表明与MMF相比,糖尿病患者人群中使用EC-MPS不会增加安全性风险。同样,除了糖尿病患者发生严重/严重感染的几率较高外,myPROMS中EC-MPS的安全性与非糖尿病患者无异。总之,初步数据表明,EC-MPS联合环孢素(+/-类固醇)可有效安全地用于糖尿病肾移植患者的器官排斥反应预防。此外,糖尿病患者显然可以安全地从MMF转换为EC-MPS。需要从前瞻性研究中获得更多数据,以全面判断EC-MPS在糖尿病移植人群中的疗效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号