首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Engineering >Comparison of stormwater solids analytical methods for performance evaluation of manufactured treatment devices
【24h】

Comparison of stormwater solids analytical methods for performance evaluation of manufactured treatment devices

机译:雨水固体分析方法对制造处理设备性能评估的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As more manufactured stormwater treatment devices enter the market, stormwater managers are searching for effective and rapid methods for evaluating device performance. Many agencies require vendors to test full-scale versions of their devices under controlled conditions. The most common parameter used to document performance is suspended solids for several reasons: (1) many pollutants attach to solids; (2) a solids simulant is relatively easy to generate; and (3) solids are comparatively easy and inexpensive to quantify. However, a controversy still exists in the profession and some regulatory agencies as to whether total suspended solids (TSS) or suspended sediment concentration (SSC), or both, should be measured. This paper focuses on the comparability of the two methods/protocols used for sample solids analysis, including lessons learned during recent evaluations of two manufactured treatment devices. Analysis of 215 sample pairs (where both TSS and SSC were measured on aliquots of the same sample) showed that statistically the TSS measured using the wide-bore pipet method and SSC results were indistinguishable from one another and from the original simulant mixture.
机译:随着越来越多的制造雨水处理设备进入市场,雨水管理人员正在寻找有效,快速的方法来评估设备性能。许多代理商要求供应商在受控条件下测试其设备的完整版本。用于记录性能的最常见参数是悬浮固体,其原因有以下几个:(1)许多污染物附着在固体上; (2)固体模拟物相对容易产生; (3)固体相对容易量化且价格便宜。但是,该行业和一些监管机构仍存在争议,即是否应测量总悬浮固体(TSS)或悬浮沉积物浓度(SSC)或两者均应测量。本文着重于用于样品固体分析的两种方法/协议的可比性,包括最近对两种制造的处理设备进行评估时吸取的教训。对215个样本对(在同一样本的等分试样上同时测量了TSS和SSC)的分析表明,统计学上使用宽口移液法测量的TSS和SSC结果彼此之间没有区别,与原始模拟混合物也没有区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号