首页> 外文期刊>Journal of earthquake and tsunami >Modeling the change of beach profile under tsunami waves: A comparison of selected sediment transport models
【24h】

Modeling the change of beach profile under tsunami waves: A comparison of selected sediment transport models

机译:在海啸中模拟海滩剖面的变化:所选泥沙输送模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In contrast to the efforts made to develop hydrodynamic models for large-scale tsunami propagation and run-up, little has been done to develop, test, and validate sediment transport models used to simulate tsunami-induced sediment movement. In this study, the performances of six widely-used sediment transport formulas are evaluated through case studies using an open source code XBeach, which is based on 2D depth-averaged nonlinear shallow water equations. Another open source code, Delft3D, is also used to see to what extent XBeach can give reliable results. The benchmarks used for case studies include three laboratory experiments and one field observation from a post-tsunami field survey conducted after the 2004 Indian tsunami. Our results show that most of the surveyed sediment transport formulas can give good results for laboratory-scale problems, but for real-scale problems, all six formulas failed to produce good results compared to those found in laboratory conditions. For laboratory-scale problems, both XBeach and Delft3D can predict satisfactory results with properly-chosen model parameters. For real tsunamis, high suspended sediment concentration may occur, and density stratification and hindered settling effect play an important role; therefore, Delft3D, with both hindered settling and density stratification being considered, may perform better than XBeach. The findings reported here will be useful for researchers and practitioners working on tsunami hazard mitigation.
机译:与开发用于大规模海啸传播和加速的水动力模型的努力相反,很少开发,测试和验证用于模拟海啸诱发的泥沙运动的泥沙输送模型。在这项研究中,通过使用开源代码XBeach(基于二维深度平均非线性浅水方程)的案例研究,评估了六个广泛使用的泥沙输送公式的性能。另一个开源代码Delft3D也用于查看XBeach在多大程度上可以提供可靠的结果。用于案例研究的基准包括三个实验室实验和一个来自2004年印度海啸后进行的海啸后实地调查的实地观察。我们的结果表明,大多数调查的泥沙运移公式都可以为实验室规模的问题提供良好的结果,但是对于实际规模的问题,与在实验室条件下发现的所有六个公式都无法产生良好的结果。对于实验室规模的问题,使用适当选择的模型参数,XBeach和Delft3D都可以预测令人满意的结果。对于真正的海啸,可能会发生高悬浮沉淀物浓度,并且密度分层和阻碍沉降作用起着重要作用。因此,考虑到受阻沉降和密度分层的情况,Delft3D的性能可能优于XBeach。此处报告的发现结果对从事减轻海啸危害的研究人员和从业人员很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号