...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Outcomes of Primary Endodontic Therapy Provided by Endodontic Specialists Compared with Other Providers
【24h】

Outcomes of Primary Endodontic Therapy Provided by Endodontic Specialists Compared with Other Providers

机译:与其他提供者相比,牙髓专科医生提供的基本牙髓治疗的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of initial nonsurgical root canal therapy for different tooth types' provided by both endodontists and other providers. Methods: By using an insurance company database, 487,476 initial nonsurgical root canal therapy procedures were followed from the time of treatment to the presence of an untoward event indicated by Current Dental Terminology codes for retreatment, apical surgery, or extraction. Population demographics were computed for provider type and tooth location. Kaplan-Meier. survival estimates were calculated for 1, 5, and 10 years. Hazard ratios for provider type and tooth location were calculated by using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The survival of all teeth collectively was 98% at 1 year, 92% at 5 years, and 86% at 10 years. Significant differences in survival on the basis of provider type were noted for molars at 5 years and for all tooth types at 10 years. The greatest difference discovered was 5% higher survival rate at 10 years for molars treated by endodontists. A hazard ratio of 1.394 was found when comparing other providers' success with that of endodontists within this 10-year molar group. Conclusions: These findings show that survival rates of endodontically treated teeth are high at 10 years after treatment regardless of provider type. Molars treated by endodontists after 10 years have significantly higher survival rates than molars treated by non-endodontists.
机译:简介:这项研究的目的是比较由牙髓科医生和其他提供者提供的针对不同类型牙齿的初始非手术式根管治疗的效果。方法:通过使用一家保险公司的数据库,从治疗时间到当前牙科术语规范指示的不良事件的再治疗,根尖手术或拔除,进行了487,476例初始非手术根管治疗程序。计算提供者类型和牙齿位置的人口统计数据。卡普兰·迈耶(Kaplan-Meier)。分别计算1年,5年和10年的生存率。通过使用Cox比例风险模型计算提供者类型和牙齿位置的风险比。结果:所有牙齿的总生存率在1年时为98%,在5年时为92%,在10年时为86%。根据提供者的类型,在5年时的磨牙和在10年时的所有牙齿类型的存活率均存在显着差异。发现的最大差异是由牙髓治疗者治疗的磨牙在10年时的存活率提高了5%。将其他提供者的成功与该十年磨牙组中的牙髓治疗者的成功率进行比较,发现危险比为1.394。结论:这些发现表明,无论提供者的类型如何,经过牙髓治疗的牙齿在治疗后10年的存活率都很高。 10年后由牙髓治疗师治疗的磨牙的存活率明显高于非牙本质病医生治疗的磨牙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号