...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: An in vitro comparison of 5 brands
【24h】

Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: An in vitro comparison of 5 brands

机译:并非所有的电子眼孔定位器都可以在具有尖顶孔的牙齿中准确定位:5个品牌的体外比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Electronic working length measurement during root canal treatment in teeth with enlarged apical foramina is a challenge. The aims of this in vitro study were (1) to assess the influence of foramen widening on the accuracy of 5 different electronic foramen locators (EFLs) and (2) to compare the accuracy of EFLs in different foramen sizes. Methods The following EFLs were used: MiniApex, Root ZXII, iPex, Propex II, and Elements Apex Locator. Each EFL was used in 3 groups (n = 20) of extracted teeth, with foramen diameters of 0.27 mm (G27), 0.47 mm (G47), and 0.72 mm (G72). Working length was measured according to manufacturer's instructions and compared with visual measurements (control method). Results were classified as accurate (equal or differences ≤ 0.05 mm) or inaccurate (differences > 0.5 mm). Results In G27, all EFLs yielded accurate findings (intragroup reliability; Fisher exact test, P <.05), compared with only MiniApex, Root ZXII, and Elements Apex Locator in G47 and G72. MiniApex, Root ZXII, and Elements Apex Locator were similarly accurate regardless of foramen size. iPex and Propex II were the least accurate among the devices tested, and foramen diameter influenced their accuracy, with greater diameters yielding poorer EFL performance. Conclusions Foramen diameter did not influence the accuracy of MiniApex, Root ZXII, and Elements Apex Locator EFLs. iPex and Propex II showed decreased accuracy as foramen size increased.
机译:简介在根尖孔扩大的牙齿的根管治疗过程中,电子工作长度的测量是一个挑战。这项体外研究的目的是(1)评估扩孔对5种不同的电子孔定位器(EFL)的准确性的影响;(2)比较不同孔大小的EFL的准确性。方法使用以下EFL:MiniApex,Root ZXII,iPex,Propex II和Elements Apex定位器。每个EFL用于3组(n = 20)拔牙,其孔直径分别为0.27 mm(G27),0.47 mm(G47)和0.72 mm(G72)。根据制造商的说明测量工作长度,并与目视测量(控制方法)进行比较。结果分为准确的(相等或差异≤0.05 mm)或不准确的(差异> 0.5 mm)。结果在G27中,与仅在G47和G72中使用MiniApex,Root ZXII和Elements Apex定位器相比,所有EFL都产生了准确的发现(组内可靠性; Fisher精确检验,P <.05)。无论孔的大小如何,MiniApex,Root ZXII和Elements Apex Locator的准确性都相似。 iPex和Propex II在测试的设备中精度最低,而开孔直径会影响其精度,较大的直径会产生较差的EFL性能。结论孔的直径不会影响MiniApex,Root ZXII和Elements Apex定位器EFL的准确性。 iPex和Propex II显示,随着孔眼大小的增加,准确性降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号