首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Comparative Evaluation of Canal Isthmus Debridement Efficacy of Modified EndoVac Technique with Different Irrigation Systems
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Canal Isthmus Debridement Efficacy of Modified EndoVac Technique with Different Irrigation Systems

机译:改良EndoVac技术与不同灌溉系统对运河峡部清创术疗效的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: The purpos of this study was to evaluate the canal isthmus debridement efficacy of a new modified EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA) irrigation protocol in comparison with EndoVac, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation in mesial roots of mandibular molars. Methods: The mesial roots of 64 extracted mandibular molars mounted in resin using Kuttler's endodontic cube, sectioned at 2 and 4 mm from the working length, were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 16): group 1: Max-I-Probe (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, York, PA), group 2: EndoVac (EVI), group 3: modified EndoVac, and group 4: PUI. The specimens were reassembled and instrumented. A standard irrigation protocol was used during cleaning and shaping and final irrigation with the 4 irrigation/agitation techniques. Images of the isthmus region were taken before and after cleaning and shaping and after final irrigation. The percentage reduction of debris in the isthmus region was calculated by using the software program Image 1 (v1.43; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Intergroup analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Intragroup analysis was performed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. The level of significance was set at P < .05. Results: lntragroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the percentage reduction of debris after cleaning and shaping and after final irrigation protocol in all the groups (P < .001). The final irrigation protocol produced significantly cleaner canal isthmuses in all the groups (P < .001). On intergroup analysis, the modified EVI group performed significantly better than the other groups. The EVI and PUI groups performed better than the Max-I-Probe group. There was no statistical significance between the EVI and PUI groups. Conclusions: Canal isthmuses were significantly cleaner. with the modified EndoVac irrigation technique when compared with the cleanliness seen with the other irrigation systems.
机译:简介:这项研究的目的是评估与EndoVac,被动超声冲洗(PUI)和传统的中根内针冲洗相比,新改良的EndoVac(Discus Dental,Culver City,CA)的根管峡清创术的疗效下颌磨牙。方法:使用Kuttler's牙髓立方体将64个拔除的下颌磨牙的近中根切成距工作长度2毫米和4毫米的部分,随机分为4组(n = 16):第1组:Max-I-Probe( Dentsply Tulsa Dental,宾夕法尼亚州约克),第2组:EndoVac(EVI),第3组:改良的EndoVac,第4组:PUI。样品被重新组装和检测。在清洗和定型以及最终的灌溉过程中,使用4种灌溉/搅拌技术使用了标准的灌溉程序。在清洁和整形之前和之后以及最终灌溉之后,拍摄峡部区域的图像。使用软件程序Image 1(v1.43;美国国立卫生研究院,贝塞斯达,马里兰州)计算峡部区域碎屑的减少百分比。使用Kruskal Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验进行组间分析。使用Friedman和Wilcoxon签署秩检验进行组内分析。显着性水平设定为P <.05。结果:组内分析显示,在所有组中,清洁和定型后以及最终冲洗后的残渣减少百分比具有统计学意义(P <.001)。最终的灌溉方案在所有组中均产生了明显更清洁的运河峡部(P <.001)。在组间分析中,改良的EVI组的表现明显优于其他组。 EVI和PUI组的性能优于Max-I-Probe组。 EVI组和PUI组之间没有统计学意义。结论:峡部峡部明显清洁。与其他灌溉系统的清洁度相比,采用改良的EndoVac灌溉技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号