首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and rotary systems in the apical third of oval-shaped canals
【24h】

Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and rotary systems in the apical third of oval-shaped canals

机译:自调节锉刀和旋转系统在椭圆形根管顶端的清洁效果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Cleaning and shaping of root canals are essential steps for the success of endodontic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tissue debridement efficacy of the self-adjusting file (SAF) protocol in the apical third of oval-shaped canals of mandibular incisors in comparison with a nickel-titanium rotary system preparation. Methods: Twenty-six single-rooted human mandibular incisor teeth were selected and assigned to a control (n = 4) and 2 experimental groups (n = 11) according to 1 of 2 instrumentation techniques, SAF and nickel-titanium rotary systems. After root canal preparation, the apical thirds of the specimens were submitted to histologic processing and analyzed by optical microscopy regarding the percentage of debris and uninstrumented root canal walls. The data were statistically compared by using unpaired t test with Welch's correction, and the level of significance was set at 5%. Results: The percentage of remaining debris and uninstrumented canal perimeter was significantly lower in SAF group (2.18 ?? 2.71 and 12.33 ?? 7.85, respectively) than in rotary group (13.11 ?? 12.98 and 53.54 ?? 15.95, respectively) (P < .05). In the SAF group most of specimens were completely free of debris, whereas in the rotary group 53% of the canals presented debris. Conclusions: SAF had significantly more contact to the dentin walls and removed more debris than rotary instrumentation in the apical third of mandibular incisors. ? 2013 American Association of Endodontists.
机译:简介:根管的清洁和整形是牙髓治疗成功的重要步骤。这项研究的目的是评估与镍钛旋转系统制备相比,自调整锉(SAF)协议在下颌切牙的椭圆形根管的顶端三分之一处的组织清创效果。方法:根据SAF和镍钛旋转系统2种仪器技术中的1种,选择26颗单根人下颌切牙,并将其分配为对照组(n = 4)和2个实验组(n = 11)。准备好根管后,将三分之二的标本进行组织学处理,并通过光学显微镜分析碎屑和非器械根管壁的百分比。使用不配对t检验和Welch校正对数据进行统计学比较,显着性水平设置为5%。结果:SAF组(分别为2.18 can 2.71和12.33 7. 7.85)的残余碎片和未器械管周长的百分比显着低于旋转组(分别为13.11 12. 12.98和53.54 15. 15.95)(P < .05)。在SAF组中,大多数标本完全没有碎屑,而在旋转组中,有53%的运河出现了碎屑。结论:在下颌切牙的顶端,与旋转器械相比,SAF与牙本质壁的接触更多,并且清除了更多碎屑。 ? 2013美国牙医学院会员协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号