【24h】

Levels of evidence for the outcome of endodontic surgery.

机译:牙髓手术结局的证据水平。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was twofold: (1) to search for clinical articles pertaining to success and failure of periapical surgery and (2) to assign levels of evidence to these studies except case reports. Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify all the literature regarding success and failure of periapical surgery since 1970. Articles were reviewed, and each article was assigned to a level of evidence from 1 (highest level) to 5 (lowest level). This search located 79 clinical studies. Among these studies, there were no level of evidence-1 randomized clinical trial studies. Five of the seven level of evidence-2 randomized clinical trials compared postoperative pain between surgical and nonsurgical retreatment. Only two level of evidence-2 randomized clinical trials compared the outcomes of surgical treatment with that of nonsurgical treatment. The majority of frequently quoted success and failure
机译:这项研究的目的是双重的:(1)寻找与根尖周手术的成功与失败有关的临床文章;(2)为这些研究分配证据水平(病例报告除外)。进行了电子和手动搜索,以查找自1970年以来有关根尖手术成功与失败的所有文献。对文章进行了审查,并对每篇文章分配的证据等级为1(最高)至5(最低)。这项搜索找到79项临床研究。在这些研究中,没有证据级别的随机临床试验研究。在7个证据级别为2的随机临床试验中,有5个比较了手术和非手术治疗之间的术后疼痛。只有两个级别的证据2随机临床试验将手术治疗与非手术治疗的结果进行了比较。大多数经常引用的成功和失败

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号