【24h】

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for aortic stent-graft surveillance.

机译:造影增强超声成像用于主动脉支架移植物监测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare unenhanced and enhanced ultrasound imaging to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for surveillance of aortic endografts. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (29 men; mean age 69 years, range 50-82) who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair agreed to participate in a follow-up program. Patients underwent CTA (26/30) or MRA (4/30), plain abdominal radiography, and unenhanced and enhanced ultrasound examinations at 3, 12, and 24 months to evaluate aneurysm diameter, endoleaks, and graft patency. The accuracy of ultrasound was compared with CTA or MRA as the reference standards. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients reached the 24-month assessment (mean follow-up 30 months, range 6-60). All endoleaks detected by CTA or MRA were confirmed by enhanced ultrasound; the aneurysm diameter in these patients remained unchanged or increased. In patients without endoleaks on any imaging method, the sac diameter remained unchanged or decreased. Endoleaks disclosed by enhanced ultrasound alone, all type II, numbered 16 at 3 months, 6 at 12 months, and 3 at 24 months. In this group, the aneurysm diameter remained unchanged or increased. Enhanced ultrasound yielded 100% sensitivity in detecting endoleaks, but compared with CTA and MRA, all endoleaks detected by enhanced ultrasound alone were false positives (mean specificity 65%). Nevertheless, because changes in the postoperative aneurysm diameter were similar in patients with endoleaks detectable on CTA/MRA and on enhanced ultrasound ("true positives") and in those with endoleaks detectable only on enhanced ultrasound ("false positives"), some endoleaks were possibly "true positive" results. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced ultrasound is a useful method in the long-term surveillance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs, possibly in association with CTA or MRA. Enhanced ultrasound also seems able to identify endoleaks missed by other imaging techniques, but this conclusion awaits further investigation.
机译:目的:将未增强和增强的超声成像与计算机断层血管造影(CTA)或磁共振血管造影(MRA)进行比较,以监测主动脉内移植物。方法:接受血管内主动脉瘤修复的连续30例患者(29名男性;平均年龄69岁,范围50-82)同意参加随访计划。患者在3、12和24个月接受CTA(26/30)或MRA(4/30),腹部平片检查以及未经增强和增强的超声检查,以评估动脉瘤直径,内漏和移植物通畅性。超声的准确性与CTA或MRA作为参考标准进行了比较。结果:26名患者达到了24个月的评估(平均随访30个月,范围6-60)。 CTA或MRA检测到的所有内漏均通过增强超声证实;这些患者的动脉瘤直径保持不变或增加。在任何影像学方法均无内漏的患者中,囊直径保持不变或减小。单独通过增强超声检查发现的所有II型内漏,在3个月时分别为16、12个月时为6、24个月时为3。在这一组中,动脉瘤直径保持不变或增加。增强型超声检测内漏的灵敏度为100%,但与CTA和MRA相比,仅增强型超声检测到的所有内漏均为假阳性(平均特异性为65%)。但是,由于在CTA / MRA和超声检查中发现内漏的患者(“真阳性”)和仅在超声检查中发现内漏的患者(“假阳性”)术后动脉瘤直径的变化相似。可能是“真正的积极”结果。结论:增强型超声是长期监测血管内主动脉瘤修复的有用方法,可能与CTA或MRA联合使用。增强型超声似乎也能够识别其他成像技术遗漏的内漏,但是这一结论有待进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号