【24h】

Endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

机译:孤立的动脉瘤的血管内修复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate a 12-year experience with endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IAA). METHODS: From August 1997 through July 2009, 91 patients (81 men; mean age 71 years, range 31-90) underwent endovascular treatment for isolated IAA at our department. Of these, 77 patients received stent-grafts either alone or in combination with coils or an Amplatzer vascular plug (n = 2); 1 patient received a Smart stent combined with coils, and 13 patients were treated with coil embolization only. The aneurysms were classified according to location: type I = common iliac artery (CIA), type II = internal iliac artery (IIA), type III = CIA and IIA, and type IV = external iliac artery with/without CIA and/or IIA involvement. RESULTS: Primary technical success was 90.1% for all aneurysm types and 93.6%, 80%, 88.8%, and 93.3% for types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Secondary technical success was 96.7% for all types and 97.8%, 95%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, for each type. Clinical success was 93.4% for all types and 97.8%, 85%, 100%, and 86.7%, respectively, by type. Complications in 18 (19.8%) patients included 7 type I endoleaks, 3 type II endoleaks, 2 enlarged aneurysm sacs (incomplete embolization), 5 cases of buttock claudication, and 2 stent-graft thromboses. Two patients were converted to open surgery; 10 underwent secondary interventions. Mortality rates were 1.1% (n = 1) at 30 death days and 23.1% (n = 21) over a mean follow-up of 45.9 months (no aneurysm-related death). Cumulative overall survival was 97.7% at 1 year and 47.6% at 10 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related complications was 88.6% at 1 year and 83.5% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of isolated IAA is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgery. However, it may be associated with several complications and must, therefore, be carefully planned.
机译:目的:回顾性评估12年孤立experience动脉瘤(IAA)的腔内修复经验。方法:从1997年8月至2009年7月,我科对91例患者(81名男性,平均年龄71岁,范围31-90)进行了孤立IAA的血管内治疗。其中77例患者单独或与线圈或Amplatzer血管塞组合接受支架移植(n = 2); 1例患者接受了结合了线圈的Smart支架,仅对13例患者进行了线圈栓塞治疗。动脉瘤根据位置进行分类:I型= common总动脉(CIA),II型= internal内动脉(IIA),III型= CIA和IIA,IV型=有/无CIA和/或IIA的外动脉参与。结果:所有类型的动脉瘤的主要技术成功率为90.1%,I,II,III和IV型分别为93.6%,80%,88.8%和93.3%。所有类型的二次技术成功率为96.7%,每种类型分别为97.8%,95%,100%和93.3%。所有类型的临床成功率为93.4%,按类型分别为97.8%,85%,100%和86.7%。 18例(19.8%)患者的并发症包括7种I型内渗漏,3种II型内渗漏,2个肿大的动脉瘤囊(栓塞不完全),5例臀部c行和2个覆膜支架血栓形成。 2例患者转为开放手术。 10接受了二次干预。在平均随访45.9个月(无动脉瘤相关死亡)的情况下,死亡30天时的死亡率为1.1%(n = 1),死亡率为23.1%(n = 21)。一年的累积总生存率为97.7%,十年则为47.6%。 1年和3年无动脉瘤相关并发症的发生率为88.6%。结论:孤立IAA的血管内修复是一种安全且微创的手术替代方案。但是,它可能会带来多种并发症,因此必须仔细计划。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号