首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >A Systematic Review of Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Computed Tomography for Endoleak Detection and Aneurysm Diameter Measurement After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
【24h】

A Systematic Review of Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Computed Tomography for Endoleak Detection and Aneurysm Diameter Measurement After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

机译:超声或磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描相比的系统评价,用于血管内动脉瘤修复后的内漏检测和动脉瘤直径测量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To analyze the literature comparing ultrasound [duplex (DUS) or contrast-enhanced (CEUS)] or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with computed tomography angiography (CTA) for endoleak detection and aneurysm diameter measurement after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A systematic review identified 31 studies that included 3853 EVAR patients who had paired scans (DUS or CEUS vs CTA or MRI vs CTA) within a 1-month interval for identification of endoleaks during EVAR surveillance. The primary outcome was the number of patients with an endoleak detected by one test but undetected by another test. Results are presented for all endoleaks and for types I and III endoleaks only. Aneurysm diameter measurements between CTA and ultrasound were examined using meta-analysis. Results: Endoleaks were seen in 25.6% (985/3853) of patients after EVAR. Fifteen studies compared DUS with CTA for the detection of all endoleak types. CTA had a significantly higher proportion of additional endoleaks detected (214/2346 vs 77/2346 for DUS). Of 19 studies comparing CEUS with CTA for the detection of all endoleak types, CEUS was more sensitive (138/1694) vs CTA (51/1694). MRI detected 42 additional endoleaks that were undetected by CTA during the paired scans, whereas CTA detected 2 additional endoleaks that MRI did not show. CTA had a similar proportion of additional types I and III endoleaks undetected by CEUS or MRI. Of 9 studies comparing ultrasound vs CTA for post-EVAR aneurysm diameter measurement, the aneurysm diameter measured by CTA was greater than ultrasound (mean difference -1.70 mm, 95% confidence interval -2.45 to -0.96, p<0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that CEUS and MRI are more accurate than CTA for the detection of post-EVAR endoleaks, but they are no better than CTA for detecting types I and III endoleaks specifically. Aneurysm diameter differences between CTA and ultrasound should be considered when evaluating the change in aneurysm diameter postoperatively.
机译:目的:分析比较超声[双工(DUS)或造影剂(CEUS)]或磁共振成像(MRI)与计算机断层摄影血管造影(CTA)在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后进行内漏检测和动脉瘤直径测量的文献。方法:系统评价确定了31项研究,包括3853名EVAR患者,他们在1个月的时间间隔内进行了配对扫描(DUS或CEUS vs CTA或MRI vs CTA),以识别EVAR监测期间的内漏。主要结局是通过一项测试检测出但未通过另一项检测发现内漏的患者数量。结果仅针对所有内漏以及I型和III型内漏显示。使用荟萃分析检查CTA和超声之间的动脉瘤直径测量值。结果:EVAR后有25.6%(985/3853)的患者出现内漏。十五项研究将DUS与CTA进行了比较,以检测所有内漏类型。 CTA检测到的额外内漏比例显着更高(DUS为214/2346,而DUS为77/2346)。在将CEUS与CTA比较以检测所有内漏类型的19项研究中,CEUS比CTA(51/1694)更为灵敏(138/1694)。 MRI在配对扫描期间检测到CTA未检测到的另外42个内漏,而CTA检测到MRI未显示的另外2个内漏。 CTA的CEUS或MRI未发现其他I型和III型内漏的比例相似。在比较超声与CTA进行EVAR后动脉瘤直径测量的9项研究中,通过CTA测量的动脉瘤直径大于超声(均差-1.70 mm,95%置信区间-2.45至-0.96,p <0.001)。结论:这项研究表明,CEUS和MRI在EVAR后内漏的检测上比CTA更准确,但在检测I型和III型内漏方面,它们并不比CTA更好。评估术后动脉瘤直径的变化时,应考虑CTA和超声检查之间的动脉瘤直径差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号