首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Endovascular repair in the thoracic and abdominal aorta: no increased risk of spinal cord ischemia when both territories are treated.
【24h】

Endovascular repair in the thoracic and abdominal aorta: no increased risk of spinal cord ischemia when both territories are treated.

机译:胸主动脉和腹主动脉的腔内修复:治疗两个区域时,脊髓缺血的风险均未增加。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the morbidity associated with thoracic and abdominal aortic repair using endovascular exclusion alone or combined endovascular and open repair. METHODS: Between January 1998 and February 2007, 49 patients (36 men; mean age 70 years) underwent treatment for thoracic and abdominal aorta disease with descending thoracic aortic (DTA) stent-graft and abdominal aortic repair. Thirty-nine patients with coexisting thoracic and abdominal pathologies were classified with multilevel aortic disease (MLAD), whereas 10 patients presented with thoracoabdominal aneurysm. Patients were separated into 3 groups: 1: thoracic stent-grafts and open abdominal repair (n = 18), group 2: thoracic and abdominal stent-grafts (n = 21), and group 3: thoracic stent-grafts with visceral artery debranching (n = 10). Prior carotid-subclavian bypass was performed in 3 (6%) patients with a dominant left vertebral artery. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was technically successful in all cases. Eight (16%) patients underwent emergent thoracic stent-graft placement. In 9 (18%) patients, the left subclavian artery was covered. No incidence of spinal cord ischemia was observed. The 30-day mortality was 4%, and overall mortality was 6% over a mean 33-month follow-up. The endoleak rate was 6% (1 type I, 1 type II, and 1 type III). CONCLUSION: Conventional or endovascular abdominal open repair in combination with DTA stent-grafting is feasible and a safe alternative to traditional open repair. Management of MLAD did not show increased incidence of spinal cord ischemia and was associated with fewer complications and deaths than simultaneous or staged open thoracic and abdominal repairs.
机译:目的:评估单独使用血管内排除术或合并血管内和开放性修复术与胸主动脉和腹主动脉修复相关的发病率。方法:在1998年1月至2007年2月之间,对49例患者(36名男性,平均年龄70岁)进行了胸主动脉降主动脉(DTA)支架移植和腹主动脉修复的治疗。 39例合并胸腹病的患者被归类为多级主动脉疾病(MLAD),而10例患者出现胸腹主动脉瘤。将患者分为三组:1:胸腔支架移植和开放式腹部修复术(n = 18),第2组:胸腔支架和腹部支架移植物(n = 21),第3组:胸腔内脏动脉支架置入术(n = 10)。在3名(6%)左椎动脉占优势的患者中进行了颈前-锁骨下旁路手术。结果:在所有情况下,支架植入物在技术上都是成功的。八名(16%)患者接受了紧急胸腔支架植入术。在9名患者中(18%),左锁骨下动脉被覆盖。没有观察到脊髓缺血的发生。在平均33个月的随访中,30天死亡率为4%,总死亡率为6%。内漏率为6%(I型1个,II型1个和III型1个)。结论:常规或血管内腹腔开放修补结合DTA支架移植术是可行的,并且是传统开放修补的安全替代方案。 MLAD的治疗并未显示出脊髓缺血的发生率增加,并且与同时或分阶段进行的开胸和腹腔修复相比,并发症和死亡更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号