...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Comparison of inhibition of cutaneous histamine reaction of ebastine fast-dissolving tablet (20 mg) versus desloratadine capsule (5 mg): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study in healthy, nonatopic
【24h】

Comparison of inhibition of cutaneous histamine reaction of ebastine fast-dissolving tablet (20 mg) versus desloratadine capsule (5 mg): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study in healthy, nonatopic

机译:依巴斯汀速溶片(20 mg)与去氯雷他定胶囊(5 mg)对皮肤组胺反应的抑制作用比较:一项健康,非特应性的随机,双盲,双模拟,安慰剂对照,三期交叉研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Ebastine is a long-acting, second-generation, selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist. A fast-dissolving tablet formulation of ebastine has been developed at 10- and 20-mg doses, with the intention of facilitating administration to patients experiencing problems with swallowing, including those confined to bed and elderly people, as well as those who may need to use ebastine when they do not have easy access to water to aid swallowing a tablet. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the pharmacodynamic effects (ie, inhibition of wheal response to cutaneous histamine challenge, and subjective assessments of itching, flare, and pain) and tolerability of the fast-dissolving 20-mg ebastine tablet formulation compared with desloratadine 5-mg capsule and placebo. Acceptability and convenience of the fast-dissolving tablet were also evaluated. METHODS: This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study was conducted at the Drug Research Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. Healthy, nonatopic, white adults aged 18 to 40 years were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 study sequences: ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CBA, or CAB, where A was the ebastine fast-dissolving 20-mg tablet, B was the desloratadine 5-mg capsule, and C was placebo. All study drugs were given orally once daily (8-9 AM) on days 1 to 5 of each study period. Study periods were separated by a washout period of 7 to 10 days. Histamine skin-prick test (SPT) challenge was performed before study drug administration on day 1 of each period (baseline), and then every 20 minutes for 2 hours after administration and again after 24 hours. The final SPT was 24 hours after the day-5 dose was administered. The primary end point was inhibition o f the histamine response, defined as the percentage reduction from baseline wheal area 24 hours after 5 days of administration. Subjective symptoms (itching, flare, and pain) were assessed by subjects using visual analog scales every 20 minutes for 2 hours after administration on day 1. At study end, acceptability (taste, convenience, and overall preference) of the fast-dissolving tablet and capsule formulations were assessed using a questionnaire completed by subjects. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination, laboratory analysis, physician questioning, and spontaneous reporting. RESULTS: Thirty-six people were randomized (22 women, 14 men; mean [SD] age, 24.7 [4.1] years; mean [SD] weight, 63.2 [9.9] kg); 35 completed the study (1 subject was lost to follow-up after the second study period). Unadjusted mean (SD) wheal areas 24 hours after dose administration on day 5 were 72.9 (29.5), 115.0 (32.1), and 146.7 (32.2) mm(2), for ebastine, desloratadine, and placebo, respectively. Mean differences in reduction from baseline in wheal area were 29.0% for ebastine versus desloratadine and 43.7% for ebastine versus placebo (both, P < 0.001). Corresponding unadjusted mean (SD) wheal areas 24 hours after administration of the first dose on day 1 were 76.5 (22.5), 128.9 (24.0), and 140.5 (33.1) mm(2). Mean itching, flare, and pain ratings were not significantly different between study drugs. Results from the preference questionnaire indicated that the majority (80%) preferred the ebastine fast-dissolving tablet to the desloratadine capsule (and hypothetically also to tablets and oral solution, which were not tested in this study). Ninety-seven percent of subjects were of the opinion that compliance in the home setting would be facilitated by the fas-tdissolving tablet formulation. Fourteen adverse events (AEs) were reported in 9 (25%) volunteers; all AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. Five occurred with ebastine 20 mg (intermittent somnolence, back pain, pharyngolaryngeal pain, pyrexia, and oral pain [1 patient each]), 5 occurred with desloratadine 5 mg (asthenia [2 patients] and dry mouth, somnolence, and back pain [1 pati
机译:背景:依巴斯汀是一种长效的第二代选择性组胺H1受体拮抗剂。已开发出一种10毫克和20毫克剂量的依巴斯汀速溶片剂,旨在促进吞咽困难的患者(包括卧床和老年人以及可能需要吞咽的患者)服用当他们不容易用水来帮助吞咽药片时,请使用ebastine。目的:本研究旨在评估速溶20 mg依巴斯汀片制剂与去氯雷他定相比的药效学作用(即抑制对皮肤组胺刺激的风疹反应,以及对瘙痒,眩光和疼痛的主观评估)和耐受性5毫克胶囊和安慰剂。还评估了速溶片剂的可接受性和便利性。方法:这项双盲,双假人,随机,安慰剂对照,三期交叉研究是在西班牙巴塞罗那圣克鲁医院的临床药理学系药物研究中心进行的。年龄为18至40岁的健康,非过敏性白人成年人被随机分配到6个研究序列中的1个:ABC,ACB,BAC,BCA,CBA或CAB,其中A是依巴斯汀速溶20 mg片剂,B是地洛他定5 mg胶囊,C为安慰剂。在每个研究期的第1至5天,每天一次(上午8-9点)口服所有研究药物。研究期由7至10天的清除期分隔。在每个时期(基线)的第1天,在研究药物给药前进行组胺皮肤刺试验(SPT)攻击,然后在给药后2小时每20分钟一次,然后在24小时后再次进行。最终的SPT是在第5天给药后24小时。主要终点是对组胺反应的抑制作用,定义为给药5天后24小时相对于基线风团面积的减少百分比。在第1天给药后2小时内,受试者每20分钟使用视觉模拟量表评估主观症状(瘙痒,眩晕和疼痛)。研究结束时,速溶片剂的可接受性(口味,便利性和总体偏爱性)使用受试者填写的问卷评估胶囊和胶囊的配方。通过体格检查,实验室分析,医师询问和自发报告评估耐受性。结果:36人被随机分组​​(22名女性,14名男性;平均[SD]年龄为24.7 [4.1]岁;平均[SD]体重为63.2 [9.9] kg); 35人完成了研究(在第二个研究阶段后失去了一名受试者进行随访)。依巴斯汀,去氯雷他定和安慰剂给药后第5天,在第5天给药后24小时的未调整平均(SD)吸气面积分别为72.9(29.5),115.0(32.1)和146.7(32.2)mm(2)。依巴斯汀与去氯雷他定相比,吸入区相对于基线的平均减少差异为29.0%,依巴斯汀与安慰剂相比为43.7%(均P <0.001)。在第1天服用第一剂24小时后,相应的未经调整的平均(SD)吸气面积为76.5(22.5),128.9(24.0)和140.5(33.1)mm(2)。研究药物之间的平均瘙痒,眩晕和疼痛等级无明显差异。偏好调查表的结果表明,大多数(80%)的患者将首选依巴斯汀速溶片而不是去氯雷他定胶囊(假设也可使用片剂和口服液,但在本研究中未进行测试)。百分之九十七的受试者认为,快速溶解片剂的配方将有助于家庭环境中的顺应性。 9名(25%)志愿者报告了14次不良事件(AEs);所有不良事件均为轻度或中度强度。依巴斯汀20 mg(间歇性嗜睡,背痛,咽喉痛,发热和口腔疼痛[各1例])发生5例,去氯雷他定5 mg(asthenia [2例]与口干,嗜睡和背痛[5]发生。 1个饼

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号