...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Surgical management of BPH in patients on oral anticoagulation: Transurethral bipolar plasma vaporization in saline versus transurethral monopolar resection of the prostate: Commentary
【24h】

Surgical management of BPH in patients on oral anticoagulation: Transurethral bipolar plasma vaporization in saline versus transurethral monopolar resection of the prostate: Commentary

机译:口服抗凝剂对BPH的外科治疗:盐水中经尿道双极血浆汽化与经尿道单极前列腺切除术的关系:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: To compare postoperative outcomes of patients on oral anticoagulation (OA) treated with transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate in saline water (TUVis) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).Materials and Methods: Between January and December 2009, 111 patients on OA therapy were treated with either TURP or TUVis in eight centers. Types of OA and peri-operative management were collected. Postoperative outcomes were statistically compared between the two groups.Results: A total of 57 (51%) and 54 (49%) patients were treated with TURP and TUVis, respectively. Types of OaA were not significantly different between the two groups, but bladder catheterization prior to surgery was more frequently observed in the TUVis group. Before surgery, 28 patients were treated with warfarin alone, 74 with a platelet aggregation inhibitor (PAI) alone, and 9 with a combination of both. PAI was withdrawn preoperatively in 50 patients. All treatments with warfarin were switched for heparin.
机译:简介:比较经盐水经尿道经尿道前列腺电汽化术(TUVis)和经尿道经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗的口服抗凝(OA)患者的术后结局。材料与方法:2009年1月至12月之间,有111例患者在OA治疗中使用TURP或TUVis在八个中心进行治疗。收集OA的类型和围手术期管理。两组之间的术后结局经过统计学比较。结果:分别接受TURP和TUVis治疗的患者分别为57例(51%)和54例(49%)。两组之间的OaA类型没有显着差异,但是在TUVis组中,手术前的膀胱导管插入术更为常见。手术前,28例患者单独接受了华法林治疗,74例接受了血小板聚集抑制剂(PAI)治疗,9例接受了两者的联合治疗。术前撤回PAI的50例患者。所有华法林治疗均改为肝素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号