首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for unilateral aldosterone producing adenoma: Partial versus total adrenalectomy
【24h】

Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for unilateral aldosterone producing adenoma: Partial versus total adrenalectomy

机译:腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗单侧醛固酮产生腺瘤的临床疗效:部分肾切除与全肾上腺切除

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the standard treatment for patients with aldosterone producing adenoma (APA). Tthe comparative effectiveness between laparoscopic total and partial adrenalectomy remains controversial, however. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes for the two procedures. Methods: We analyzed the patients with unilateral APA undergoing laparoscopic total or partial adrenalectomy during the period 2008 to 2011. All surgical procedures were performed transperitoneally. We compared the perioperative and postoperative parameters between two procedures. Clinical outcomes including serum aldosterone, renin, and potassium levels, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were assessed and compared at 1 year after operation. Results: A total of 63 cases (16 partial and 47 total adrenalectomies) were included. There were no differences with regard to age, sex, hypertension duration, and tumor size as well as preoperative blood pressure, serum aldosterone, rennin, and potassium levels between the two groups. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, blood loss, and complications were similar between the two groups. The clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up including serum aldosterone, renin, and potassium levels and blood pressure significantly improved in both groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy is technically feasible and yields similar perioperative, postoperative, and 1-year clinical outcomes to those of total adrenalectomy for the treatment of patients with unilateral APA. A prospective randomized study with a larger sample size is needed to further prove the cost and effectiveness of the two procedures.
机译:背景与目的:腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是产生醛固酮腺瘤(APA)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,腹腔镜全肾切除术和部分肾上腺切除术之间的相对有效性仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种手术的临床结果。方法:我们分析了2008年至2011年期间接受腹腔镜全部或部分肾上腺切除术的单侧APA患者。所有外科手术均经腹膜进行。我们比较了两种手术之间的围手术期和术后参数。术后1年评估并比较包括血清醛固酮,肾素和钾水平以及收缩压和舒张压(DBP)在内的临床结局。结果:总共包括63例(部分16例,总肾上腺切除术47例)。两组之间在年龄,性别,高血压持续时间,肿瘤大小以及术前血压,血清醛固酮,肾素和钾水平方面无差异。两组的围手术期和术后结局如手术时间,住院时间,失血量和并发症均相似。两组患者在1年随访中的临床结局包括血清醛固酮,肾素,钾水平和血压均明显改善。结论:腹腔镜部分肾上腺切除术在技术上是可行的,并且在围手术期,术后和1年期的临床结局方面与全肾上腺切除术治疗单侧APA患者相似。需要前瞻性随机研究以更大的样本量来进一步证明这两种方法的成本和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号