...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Aspirin compared with acetaminophen in the treatment of fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in adults: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, 6-hour dose-rangi
【24h】

Aspirin compared with acetaminophen in the treatment of fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in adults: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, 6-hour dose-rangi

机译:阿司匹林与对乙酰氨基酚治疗成人发烧及其他上呼吸道感染症状的比较:多中心,随机,双盲,双假,安慰剂对照,平行组,单剂量,6小时剂量兰吉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and acetaminophen (paracetamol) are frequently used to treat fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Both are available over the counter for use at the standard recommended doses of 500 and 1000 mg per single use. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy, safety profiles, and tolerability of aspirin 500 and 1000 mg and acetaminophen 500 and 1000 mg compared with placebo in adult patients with acute febrile URTI of suspected viral origin. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted in Ukraine and Russia. Patients with URTI and acute fever of > or =38.5 degrees C received a single dose of aspirin 500 or 1000 mg, acetaminophen 500 or 1000 mg, or matching placebo. Oral body temperature was measured in the clinic at specified time points up to 6 hours after dosing. The intensity of other symptoms of URTI was rated by patients at baseline and at 2, 4,and 6 hours after dosing (scale from 0 = none to 10 = severe). The primary efficacy measure was the AUC for the change in orally measured body temperature from the time of treatment (baseline) to 4 hours after dosing. Secondary outcome measures included the change in body temperature from baseline to specified time points between 0.5 and 6 hours after dosing, the difference between baseline and the lowest measured body temperature, the time to the lowest measured body temperature, and the intensity of other symptoms of URTI (ie, headache, sinus sensitivity to percussion, sore throat, achiness, and feverish discomfort). Tolerability was monitored by recording of adverse events. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled (78 in both aspirin groups, 79 in both acetaminophen groups, 78 in the placebo group). Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable in the 5 groups; 51% of patients were male, with a mean age of 37.4 years and a mean body weight of 74.3 kg. The AUC values for the change in body temperature 0 to 4 hours after dosing were 3.18 (95% CI, 2.78-3.57) for aspirin 500 mg, 4.26 (95% CI, 3.84-4.68) for aspirin 1000 mg, 3.13 (95% CI, 2.77-3.49) for acetaminophen 500 mg, 4.11 (95% CI, 3.73-4.49) for acetaminophen 1000 mg, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.38-1.13) for placebo. In terms of the primary efficacy variable, all active treatments were significantly superior to placebo (P < 0.001, 1-sided t test), with no significant differences between them. Reductions in body temperature were significantly greater with the 1000-mg doses of both active treatments compared with the 500-mg doses (P< 0.001, 1-sided t test). The mean maximum temperature reductions were 1.32 degrees C, 1.25 degrees C, 1.67 degrees C,1.71 degrees C, and 0.63 degrees C in the respective treatment groups. Significant reductions were seen in the mean intensity of headache, achiness, and feverish discomfort with all active treatments at most time points (P < 0.001), but not in sinus sensitivity to percussion or sore throat. All treatments were equally well tolerated, and no clinically significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-dose study, aspirin 500 and 1000 mg and acetaminophen 500 and 1000 mg were more effective against fever and other symptoms of URTI than placebo. Both active treatments showed dose-related efficacy, and there was no significant difference between equal doses of the 2 agents. Safety profiles and tolerability were also comparable between treatments.
机译:背景:阿司匹林(乙酰水杨酸)和对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)经常用于治疗发烧和其他上呼吸道感染(URTI)症状。两种都可以在柜台上以每次建议的500和1000 mg的标准推荐剂量使用。目的:本研究调查了阿司匹林500和1000 mg以及对乙酰氨基酚500和1000 mg与安慰剂相比在成人疑似病毒性发热性URTI患者中的疗效,安全性和耐受性。方法:这是在乌克兰和俄罗斯进行的多中心,随机,双盲,双假人,安慰剂对照,平行组试验。 URTI和≥38.5摄氏度的急性发烧患者接受单剂阿司匹林500或1000 mg,对乙酰氨基酚500或1000 mg或匹配的安慰剂。服药后最多6个小时,在指定的时间点在诊所测量口腔体温。患者在基线时以及给药后2、4和6小时对URTI的其他症状的强度进行了评估(等级从0 =无到10 =严重)。主要功效指标是从治疗时间(基线)到给药后4小时,口服测得的体温变化的AUC。次要结局指标包括用药后0.5到6个小时内从基线到指定时间点的体温变化,基线与最低测得体温之间的差,达到最低测得体温的时间以及其他症状强度URTI(即头痛,对撞击的鼻窦敏感,喉咙痛,成就感和发烧不适)。通过记录不良事件来监测耐受性。结果:392例患者入组(两个阿司匹林组78个,两个对乙酰氨基酚组79个,安慰剂组78个)。 5组的人口统计学和基线特征具有可比性。 51%的患者是男性,平均年龄为37.4岁,平均体重为74.3 kg。给药后0至4小时的体温变化的AUC值对于阿司匹林500 mg为3.18(95%CI,2.78-3.57),对于阿司匹林1000 mg为4.26(95%CI,3.84-4.68),3.13(95%)对乙酰氨基酚500 mg的CI为2.77-3.49),对乙酰氨基酚1000 mg的CI为4.11(95%CI,3.73-4.49)和安慰剂为0.76(95%CI为0.38-1.13)。在主要疗效变量方面,所有积极治疗均显着优于安慰剂(P <0.001,单侧t检验),两者之间无显着差异。与500毫克剂量相比,两种有效治疗方法的1000毫克剂量的体温降低明显更大(P <0.001,单侧t检验)。在各个治疗组中,平均最大降温幅度分别为1.32摄氏度,1.25摄氏度,1.67摄氏度,1.71摄氏度和0.63摄氏度。在大多数时间点,所有积极治疗的平均头痛强度,成就感和发烧不适程度均显着降低(P <0.001),但窦房结对sensitivity诊或咽喉痛的敏感性并未降低。所有治疗的耐受性均相同,并且没有发生临床上显着的不良事件。结论:在这项单剂量研究中,阿司匹林500和1000 mg和对乙酰氨基酚500和1000 mg比安慰剂对发烧和其他URTI症状更有效。两种有效治疗均显示出剂量相关的功效,并且两种药物的等剂量剂量之间无显着差异。治疗之间的安全性和耐受性也相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号