首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >A comparison of the risk of hospitalizations due to chronicobstructive pulmonary disease in medicaid patients with various medication regimens, including ipratropium, inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol, or their combination.
【24h】

A comparison of the risk of hospitalizations due to chronicobstructive pulmonary disease in medicaid patients with various medication regimens, including ipratropium, inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol, or their combination.

机译:比较接受各种药物治疗方案(包括异丙托溴铵,吸入皮质类固醇,沙美特罗或其组合)的药物治疗患者因慢性阻塞性肺疾病而住院的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of hospitalizations related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among Medicaid patients prescribed various medication regimens. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective study set in the Texas Medicaid program. Eligible patients were aged 40 to 65 years, had a primary or secondary diagnosis of COPD, and had >/=1 prescription for ipratropium (IPR), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), or salmeterol (SAL) between January 1, 1998, and August 31, 2000. Five index therapy groups were included in the risk analysis: IPR alone, ICS alone, SAL alone, ICS + IPR, and ICS + SAL. RESULTS: A total of 4447 patients were included in the study (IPR alone, n = 2435; ICS alone, n = 1088; SAL alone, n = 299; ICS + IPR, n = 410; and ICS + SAL, n = 215). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, ICS + SAL was associated with a 35% lower risk of COPD-related hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 0.653 [95% CI, 0.428-0.997]) versus IPR alone. ICS alone was associated with a 16% lower risk (HR, 0.844 [95% CI, 0.693-1.028]) and SAL alone was associated with a 24% lower risk (HR, 0.756 [95% CI, 0.539-1.060]) versus IPR alone, but neither of these was statistically significant. There was no decrease in risk with ICS + IPR versus IPR alone (HR, 1.111 [95% CI, 0.870-1.420]). Variables that indicated increased risk were as follows: increasing age (HR, 1.015 [95% CI, 1.003-1.027]); number of preindex emergency department visits (HR, 1.189 [95% CI, 1.080-1.309]); number of preindex hospitalization visits (HR, 1.342 [95% CI, 1.220-1.477] ); number of nonrespiratory comorbid diagnoses (HR, 1.046 [95% CI, 1.012-1.081]); and having a diagnosis of influenza/pneumonia (HR, 1.276 [95% CI, 1.062-1.533]) or other respiratory diseases (HR, 1.356 [95% CI, 1.134-1.622]). Comorbid asthma was not associated with increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: ICS + SAL was associated with a significantly lower risk of COPD-related hospitalization compared with IPR alone during the initial 12 monthsof therapy in a Medicaid population. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings across different populations.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较在处方了各种药物治疗方案的医疗补助患者中与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关的住院风险。方法:这是在德克萨斯医疗补助计划中进行的一项观察性回顾性研究。符合条件的患者年龄在40至65岁之间,对COPD进行了初次或二次诊断,并在1998年1月1日至8月之间对异丙托铵(IPR),吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)或沙美特罗(SAL)进行了> / = 1处方2000年3月31日。风险分析包括五个指数治疗组:仅IPR,仅ICS,SAL,ICS + IPR和ICS + SAL。结果:该研究共纳入4447例患者(仅IPR,n = 2435;仅ICS,n = 1088;仅SAL,n = 299; ICS + IPR,n = 410;以及ICS + SAL,n = 215 )。调整基线特征后,与仅使用IPR相比,ICS + SAL与COPD相关住院风险降低35%(危险比[HR],0.653 [95%CI,0.428-0.997])。单独的ICS可使风险降低16%(HR,0.844 [95%CI,0.693-1.028]),而单独的SAL则将风险降低24%(HR,0.756 [95%CI,0.539-1.060])。单独使用IPR,但这些都不具有统计学意义。与单独使用IPR相比,ICS + IPR的风险没有降低(HR,1.111 [95%CI,0.870-1.420])。表明风险增加的变量如下:年龄增加(HR,1.015 [95%CI,1.003-1.027]);索引前急诊科就诊次数(HR,1.189 [95%CI,1.080-1.309]);索引前住院访问的次数(HR,1.342 [95%CI,1.220-1.477]);非呼吸性合并症诊断数(HR,1.046 [95%CI,1.012-1.081]);并具有流感/肺炎(HR,1.276 [95%CI,1.062-1.53​​3])或其他呼吸系统疾病(HR,1.356 [95%CI,1.134-1.622])的诊断。合并症与哮喘风险增加无关。结论:在最初的12个月内,医疗补助人群中ICS + SAL与COPD相关住院风险显着低于单独IPR。需要进一步的研究以确认不同人群的这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号