首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: Simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy
【24h】

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: Simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy

机译:内镜联合肾脏内手术治疗大结石:同时使用柔性输尿管镜和小型经皮肾镜取石术克服了经皮肾镜取石术单一疗法的缺点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the standard procedure for the removal of large renal calculi. The development of the "minimally invasive PCNL" (mini-PCNL) has reduced the complications of the surgery; it also appears to be associated with less morbidity than the conventional PCNL (con-PCNL). This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic intrarenal surgery, using the prone-split leg position, using flexible ureteroscopy and mini-PCNL (mini- endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery [ECIRS]) by retrospectively comparing this technique with mini-PCNL and con-PCNL. Patients and Methods: In total, 161 consecutive patients who were observed for the follow-up of large renal calculi between February 2004 and January 2013 were selected for mini-ECIRS (60), mini-PCNL (19), or con-PCNL (82). Mini-ECIRS was performed with patients in the prone split-leg position via 18F minipercutaneous tract and 14F ureteral access sheath. The mini-PCNL was performed via 18F percutaneous tract and con-PCNL performed via the 30F tract. Mean size of the renal calculi removed via mini-ECIRS, mini-PCNL, and con-PCNL were 39.2, 38.4, and 34.6 mm, respectively. Results: Average surgical time for mini-ECIRS was shorter than that for mini-PCNL and con-PCNL (120.5 vs 181.9 vs 134.1 min, respectively; P<0.001). The stone-free rate for mini-ECIRS was significantly higher than that of the other procedures (initial rates 81.7% vs 38.9% vs 45.1%, respectively; P<0.001; rates after further treatment 86.7% vs 61.1% vs 61.0%, respectively; P=0.002). Only one patient in the mini-ECIRS group needed blood transfusions. The decrease in hemoglobin during mini-ECIRS and mini-PCNL was significantly lower than that during con-PCNL (P=0.011). Conclusion: Mini-ECIRS is better than monotherapy with mini-PCNL or con-PCNL. The study results show that mini-ECIRS is a safe, efficient, and versatile procedure that can be effective for the management of renal calculi.
机译:背景与目的:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)被认为是去除大肾结石的标准方法。 “微创PCNL”(mini-PCNL)的发展减少了手术的并发症。与常规PCNL(con-PCNL)相比,它的发病率似乎更低。这项研究旨在回顾性地将该技术与mini-PCNL和con-common进行比较,以俯卧的腿部位置,挠性输尿管镜和mini-PCNL(mini-内窥镜联合肾内手术[ECIRS])评估内镜肾内手术的疗效。 PCNL。患者和方法:选择2004年2月至2013年1月之间连续进行大肾结石随访的161例患者,选择mini-ECIRS(60),mini-PCNL(19)或con-PCNL( 82)。通过18F微型经皮道和14F输尿管进入鞘对处于俯卧双腿位置的患者进行Mini-ECIRS。 mini-PCNL通过18F经皮道进行,con-PCNL通过30F经皮道进行。通过mini-ECIRS,mini-PCNL和con-PCNL切除的肾结石的平均大小分别为39.2 mm,38.4和34.6 mm。结果:mini-ECIRS的平均手术时间比mini-PCNL和con-PCNL的平均手术时间短(分别为120.5分钟,181.9分钟和134.1分钟; P <0.001)。 mini-ECIRS的无结石率显着高于其他手术(初始率分别为81.7%,38.9%和45.1%; P <0.001;进一步治疗后的比率分别为86.7%,61.1%和61.0% ; P = 0.002)。 mini-ECIRS组中只有一名患者需要输血。 mini-ECIRS和mini-PCNL期间血红蛋白的减少显着低于con-PCNL期间(P = 0.011)。结论:Mini-ECIRS优于mini-PCNL或con-PCNL的单药治疗。研究结果表明,mini-ECIRS是一种安全,有效且用途广泛的程序,可有效管理肾结石。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号