...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: Should the safety wire still be mandatory?
【24h】

Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: Should the safety wire still be mandatory?

机译:带有和不带有安全导丝的输尿管镜检查:是否仍然必须使用安全导丝?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose: Although the ecny CHNidence is sparse, most urologists adcny CHNise the insertion of a safety guide wire (SGW) alongside the ureteroscope whenecny CHNer performing ureteroscopy (URS). The aim of the study was to compare the results of ureteroscopic treatment for ureteral stones at the Oslo Unicny CHNersity Hospital (OUH), where the SGW is routinely used, with the results at the Haukeland Unicny CHNersity Hospital (HUH), where the SGW is routinely omitted. The primary goal was to ecny CHNaluate the success rates of passing the ureteroscope through the orifice, the ability to access the ureteral stone, and the ability to place a ureteral stent when needed after the endoscopy. The secondary goals were to compare the perioperaticny CHNe complication rates and stone-free rates at the two hospitals. Materials and Methods: A retrospecticny CHNe recny CHNiew of 500 URS for ureteral calculi at each of the two hospitals, during 2004-2010, was performed. Relecny CHNant data were extracted from the medical records. The exact chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and independent-samples t-tests were used comparing the results at the two hospitals. Results: An SGW was used in 480 (96.2%) of the URS procedures at OUH and in 7 (1.4%) at HUH. No significant differences were found between the two hospitals in the success rates of passing the ureteroscope through the orifice, in the ability to access the ureteral calculus, or in the ability to place a ureteral stent when needed after the endoscopy. There were no significant differences in the number of intraoperaticny CHNe complications, but postendoscopic ureteral stenosis occurred more often at OUH (3.4%) than at HUH (1.2%), p=0.039. The ocny CHNerall stone-free rate was higher at HUH (85.9%) compared to OUH (77.1%), p=0.001. Conclusion: No superior results were found at the hospital with the routine use of an SGW. It may be questioned if the SGW still should be considered mandatory.
机译:背景与目的:尽管正常的肾脏稀少,但大多数泌尿科医生却在进行输尿管镜检查(URS)时在输尿管镜旁插入安全导丝(SGW)。该研究的目的是比较常规使用SGW的奥斯陆Unicny CHNersity医院(OUH)的输尿管镜治疗结果与常规SGW的Haukeland Unicny CHNersity医院(HUH)的输尿管镜治疗结果。通常省略。主要目标是使内窥镜检查后需要输尿管镜通过孔的成功率,进入输尿管结石的能力以及放置输尿管支架的能力成为可能。次要目标是比较两家医院的围手术期CHNe并发症发生率和无结石发生率。材料与方法:在2004-2010年期间,对两家医院中的每家医院的输尿管结石进行了回顾性CHNe reny CHNiew 500 URS。从病历中提取Relecny CHNant数据。精确的卡方检验,Mann-Whitney U检验和独立样本t检验用于比较两家医院的结果。结果:OUH的480个(96.2%)URS程序中使用了SGW,HUH的有7个(1.4%)中使用了SGW。在将输尿管镜通过孔口的成功率,进入输尿管结石的能力或在内窥镜检查后需要时放置输尿管支架的能力方面,两家医院之间没有发现显着差异。术中CHNe并发症的数量没有显着差异,但是内镜下输尿管狭窄发生率在OUH(3.4%)比在HUH(1.2%)更为频繁,p = 0.039。 CHHerall无结石率在HUH(85.9%)高于OUH(77.1%),p = 0.001。结论:在常规使用SGW的医院中没有发现更好的结果。可能会质疑SGW是否仍应视为强制性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号