首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Global randomized narrow band imaging versus white light study in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: Accession to the first milestone-enrollment of 600 patients
【24h】

Global randomized narrow band imaging versus white light study in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: Accession to the first milestone-enrollment of 600 patients

机译:非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的全球随机窄带成像与白光研究:首次入组600名患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Study Objective: To estimate patient preferences insofar as the cosmetic appeal of abdominal incisions used for hysterectomy. We hypothesized that the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) incision would be preferred cosmetically to traditional multiport laparoscopic incisions and open abdominal incisions via Pfannenstiel, vertical midline, or horizontal mini-laparotomy. Design: Prospective comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Two gynecology clinics at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. Patients: Seventy-three women including 50 consecutive women from a private specialty clinic and 23 consecutive women from a resident indigent care clinic. Interventions: A brief questionnaire was distributed that assessed preferences via ranking and by using a visual analog scale. Patients were also asked to rate the importance of 4 factors in their decision making: size, location, and number of incisions, and perceived recovery time. Descriptive statistics, t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and ??2 tests were used to compare continuous or categorical values. Measurements and Main Results: Overall, the LESS incision was the most preferred incision according to most common choice and visual analog scale scores. In the private clinic, the LESS incision was preferred most often, with 53% of women (39/73) ranking it as their first choice. In the resident clinic, the horizontal mini-laparotomy incision was preferred most often, with 27% of women (20/73) ranking it their first choice. Neither the demographic factors nor any of the factors in decision making explained the difference between the clinics. Conclusion: The LESS incision was most preferred in this study. However, the horizontal mini-laparotomy incision and the traditional laparoscopic with low lateral incisions were also highly preferred. Patient perception of the " visibility" of abdominal incisions may be the distinguishing issue to explain the difference in the preferences between the clinics and the differences between the present study and previously published studies of cosmetic preferences. ? 2013 AAGL.
机译:研究目的:评估就子宫切除术使用的腹部切口的美观性而言,患者的喜好。我们假设,通过Pfannenstiel,垂直中线或水平小型腹腔镜开腹术,在美容上,腹腔镜内单点手术(LESS)切口在外观上要优于传统的多端口腹腔镜切口和开放腹部切口。设计:前瞻性比较研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。地点:北卡罗来纳州达勒姆的杜克大学医学中心的两家妇科诊所。患者:73名妇女,其中包括来自私人专科诊所的50名连续妇女和来自居民贫困护理诊所的23名连续妇女。干预措施:分发了一份简短的问卷,该问卷通过排名和使用视觉模拟量表来评估偏好。还要求患者评价其决策中的四个因素的重要性:切口的大小,位置和数目以及恢复时间。描述性统计量,t检验,Wilcoxon秩和检验和2检验用于比较连续值或分类值。测量和主要结果:总体而言,根据最常见的选择和视觉模拟量表评分,LESS切口是最优选的切口。在私家诊所,LESS切口是最常使用的切口,53%的女性(39/73)将其列为首选。在住院诊所中,最常用的是水平小切口开腹手术,其中27%(20/73)的女性将其作为首选。人口统计学因素或决策中的任何因素都不能解释诊所之间的差异。结论:LESS切口在该研究中是最优选的。然而,水平小切口开腹手术和传统的腹腔镜低侧切开术也是高度优选的。病人对腹部切口“可见性”的感知可能是一个有区别的问题,以解释诊所之间的喜好差异以及本研究与先前发表的关于化妆品喜好的研究之间的差异。 ? 2013 AAGL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号