首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Can the need for palliative transurethral prostatic resection in patients with advanced carcinoma of the prostate be predicted?
【24h】

Can the need for palliative transurethral prostatic resection in patients with advanced carcinoma of the prostate be predicted?

机译:是否可以预测晚期前列腺癌患者姑息性经尿道前列腺切除术的需求?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To identify the factors predicting the need for palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (channel TURP) in patients with advanced carcinoma of the prostate (CAP) receiving androgen ablation therapy. Patients and Methods: From January 1996 to January 2004, 203 patients with advanced CAP were treated by androgen ablation. Patients presenting with retention were catheterized initially, and those (N = 12) who failed a catheter-free trial and had immediate channel TURP were excluded. The remaining 191 patients were followed every 3 months (mean 35.5 months, range 6-92 months). Patients requiring channel TURP (group 1; N = 42 [22%]) during follow-up were compared with those who did not (group 2) for predictive factors, viz. retention of urine, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration, Gleason sum, prostate size, and bony metastasis at presentation. Results: Channel TURP was performed at a mean of 21 months (range 3-72 months). The mean Gleason sum in this group was 7.88, whereasit was 7.29 in group 2 (P = 0.013). Retention at presentation was significantly more common in group 1 (N = 26; 61.9%) than in group 2 (N = 46; 30.8%; P = 0.001). Patients who did not present with retention and had Gleason sums 7, 71.4% required channel TURP. Other factors were not found to be significantly different in the two groups. Conclusion: High Gleason sum and retention at presentation are significant factors predictors of the need for channel TURP during follow-up in patients with advanced CAP receiving androgen ablation therapy.
机译:目的:确定那些接受雄激素消融治疗的晚期前列腺癌(CAP)患者,预测需要进行姑息性经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP通道)的因素。患者与方法:从1996年1月至2004年1月,对203例晚期CAP患者进行了雄激素消融治疗。表现为retention留的患者首先要进行导管插入,而无导管试验失败并具有即时通道TURP的患者(N = 12)被排除。其余191例患者每3个月进行随访(平均35.5个月,范围6-92个月)。将随访期间需要通道TURP的患者(组1; N = 42 [22%])与未使用通道TURP的患者(组2)的预测因素进行比较,即。保留尿液,血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度,格里森总和,前列腺大小和骨转移。结果:频道TURP平均执行21个月(范围3-72个月)。该组的平均格里森总和为7.88,而第二组的平均值为7.29(P = 0.013)。第1组(N = 26; 61.9%)比第2组(N = 46; 30.8%; P = 0.001)明显更常见。没有出现retention留且格里森总数为 7的14例患者中,有71.4%的患者需要通道TURP。两组中没有发现其他因素有显着差异。结论:高格里森总和和就诊保留是晚期CAP接受雄激素消融治疗的患者随访期间需要TURP通道的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号