...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Econometrics >Incorrect asymptotic size of subsampling procedures based on post-consistent model selection estimators
【24h】

Incorrect asymptotic size of subsampling procedures based on post-consistent model selection estimators

机译:基于一致后的模型选择估计量的二次抽样程序的渐近大小不正确

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Subsampling and the m out of n bootstrap have been suggested in the literature as methods for carrying out inference based on post-model selection estimators and shrinkage estimators. In this paper we consider a subsampling confidence interval (CI) that is based on an estimator that can be viewed either as a post-model selection estimator that employs a consistent model selection procedure or as a super-efficient estimator. We show that the subsampling CI (of nominal level 1 -- a for any a e (0,1)) has asymptotic confidence size (defined to be the limit of finite-sample size) equal to zero in a very simple regular model. The same result holds for the m out of n bootstrap provided m~2 -> 0 and the observations are i.i.d. Similar zero-asymptotic-confidence-size results hold in more complicated models that are covered by the general results given in the paper and for super-efficient and shrinkage estimators that are not post-model selection estimators. Based on these results, subsampling and the mout of n bootstrap are not recommended for obtaining inference based on post-consistent model selection or shrinkage estimators.
机译:在文献中已经提出了二次采样和n自m自举法作为基于模型后选择估计量和收缩估计量进行推断的方法。在本文中,我们考虑了基于估计量的二次抽样置信区间(CI),该估计量可以视为采用一致模型选择过程的模型后选择量估计器,也可以视为超高效估计量。我们显示,在非常简单的常规模型中,二次抽样CI(名义水平为1-对于任何e(0,1)的a)的渐近置信度大小(定义为有限样本大小的极限)为零。如果m〜2 / / n-> 0,则n个引导程序中的m个保持相同的结果,且观测值为i.d.类似的零渐近置信度大小结果适用于更复杂的模型,这些模型被本文给出的一般结果所覆盖,并且适用于不是模型后选择估计量的超高效和收缩估计量。基于这些结果,建议不要使用二次抽样和n bootstrap的小数来获得基于后一致模型选择或收缩估计量的推断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号