首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Entomology >Evaluation of surveillance methods for monitoring house fly abundance and activity on large commercial dairy operations
【24h】

Evaluation of surveillance methods for monitoring house fly abundance and activity on large commercial dairy operations

机译:评价大型商业乳业运营中监测家蝇丰度和活动的监测方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Relative house fly, Musca domestica L., activity at three large dairies in central California was monitored during the peak fly activity period from June to August 2005 by using spot cards, fly tapes, bait traps, and Alsynite traps. Counts for all monitoring methods were significantly related at two of three dairies; with spot card counts significantly related to fly tape counts recorded the same week, and both spot card counts and fly tape counts significantly related to bait trap counts 1-2 wk later. Mean fly counts differed significantly between dairies, but a significant interaction between dairies sampled and monitoring methods used demonstrates that between-dairy comparisons are unwise. Estimate precision was determined by the coefficient of variability (CV) (or SE/mean). Using a CV = 0.15 as a desired level of estimate precision and assuming an integrate pest management (IPM) action threshold near the peak house fly activity measured by each monitoring method, house fly monitoring at a large dairy would require 12 spot cards placed in midafternoon shaded fly resting sites near cattle or seven bait traps placed in open areas near cattle. Software (FlySpotter; http://ucanr.org/sites/FlySpotter/download/) using computer vision technology was developed to count fly spots on a scanned image of a spot card to dramatically reduce time invested in monitoring house flies. Counts provided by the FlySpotter software were highly correlated to visual counts. The use of spot cards for monitoring house flies is recommended for dairy IPM programs.
机译:在2005年6月至2005年8月的高峰蝇活动期间,使用斑点卡,蝇带,诱饵诱捕器和Alsynite诱捕器对加利福尼亚中部三个大型奶牛场的相对蝇蝇的活动进行了监测。在三个奶牛场中的两个,所有监测方法的计数都显着相关。现货卡计数与同一周记录的飞行磁带计数显着相关,现货卡计数和飞行磁带计数与1-2周后诱饵陷阱计数显着相关。奶场之间的平均蝇数显着不同,但是采样的奶场与使用的监测方法之间的显着相互作用表明,奶场间的比较是不明智的。估计精度由变异系数(CV)(或SE /平均值)确定。使用CV = 0.15作为所需的估计精度水平,并假设通过每种监测方法测得的峰值家蝇活动附近的有害生物综合治理(IPM)行动阈值,在大型乳制品场进行家蝇监测需要在午后放置12张斑点卡靠近牛的阴暗苍蝇栖息地,或在靠近牛的空地放置七个诱饵陷阱。开发了使用计算机视觉技术的软件(FlySpotter; http://ucanr.org/sites/FlySpotter/download/),以对点卡扫描图像上的飞点进行计数,从而大大减少了监视家蝇的时间。 FlySpotter软件提供的计数与视觉计数高度相关。对于乳制品IPM计划,建议使用现场卡监视家蝇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号