首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Cost-effectiveness of aspirin, celecoxib, and calcium chemoprevention for colorectal cancer.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of aspirin, celecoxib, and calcium chemoprevention for colorectal cancer.

机译:阿司匹林,塞来昔布和钙化学预防对结直肠癌的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Studies have indicated that aspirin chemoprevention may be effective in preventing colorectal cancer within the general population, and aspirin, celecoxib, and calcium may be effective in preventing adenomas within those people who have previously undergone polypectomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of aspirin, celecoxib, and calcium chemoprevention in the context of the fecal occult blood test screening program. METHODS: An existing state transition model developed to assess colorectal cancer screening options was modified to incorporate the costs and outcomes associated with chemoprevention. Relative risks of disease progression were incorporated based on the effectiveness of the chemopreventive agents. Additional benefits and harms associated with chemoprevention were included. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Aspirin chemoprevention plus screening within the general population aged 50 to 60 years is estimated to cost pound23,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with screening alone (based on 2008 prices). For individuals who have undergone polypectomy, calcium is estimated to cost between pound8000 and pound30,000 per QALY gained depending on the starting and stopping age of the chemoprevention policy. Based on current evidence, calcium has a higher probability than aspirin of providing value for money within this population, although the long-term benefits and harms are subject to considerable uncertainty. Celecoxib chemoprevention is unlikely to be considered to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Calcium chemoprevention is likely to be a cost-effective option for individuals who have undergone polypectomy. Further research is required to assess the long-term benefits and harms of calcium compared with aspirin chemoprevention. Chemoprevention appears less economically attractive within the general population.
机译:背景:研究表明,阿司匹林化学预防可能有效预防普通人群中的结肠直肠癌,而阿司匹林,塞来昔布和钙可能有效预防先前进行息肉切除术的人群中的腺瘤。目的:在粪便潜血测试筛查程序的背景下评估阿司匹林,塞来昔布和钙化学预防的成本效益。方法:修改现有的状态转移模型以评估结肠直肠癌的筛查选择,以纳入与化学预防相关的成本和结果。基于化学预防剂的有效性,纳入了疾病进展的相对风险。包括与化学预防有关的其他利弊。进行了敏感性分析。结果:与仅进行筛查相比(基于2008年价格),在50至60岁的普通人群中,阿司匹林的化学预防加筛查每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY),估计要花费23,000英镑。对于进行了息肉切除术的个体,根据化学预防政策的起始和终止年龄,估计每个获得的QALY钙的成本在8000英镑至30,000英镑之间。根据目前的证据,尽管长期收益和损害存在相当大的不确定性,但钙在该人群中提供物有所值的可能性要高于阿司匹林。塞来昔布化学预防不太可能被认为具有成本效益。结论:钙化学预防可能是进行息肉切除术的个体的一种经济有效的选择。与阿司匹林化学预防相比,需要进一步的研究来评估钙的长期利弊。在一般人群中,化学预防在经济上似乎不那么吸引人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号