...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Econometrics >Exact and asymptotic tests for possibly non-regular hypotheses on stochastic volatility models
【24h】

Exact and asymptotic tests for possibly non-regular hypotheses on stochastic volatility models

机译:随机波动率模型上可能不规则假设的精确和渐近检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We study the problem of testing hypotheses on the parameters of one- and two-factor stochastic volatility models (SV), allowing for the possible presence of non-regularities such as singular moment conditions and unidentified parameters, which can lead to non-standard asymptotic distributions. We focus on the development of simulation-based exact procedures - whose level can be controlled in finite samples -as well as on large-sample procedures which remain valid under non-regular conditions. We consider Wald-type, score-type and likelihood-ratio-type tests based on a simple moment estimator, which can be easily simulated. We also propose a C(alpha)-type test which is very easy to implement and exhibits relatively good size and power properties. Besides usual linear restrictions on the SV model coefficients, the problems studied include testing homoskedasticity against a SV alternative (which involves singular moment conditions under the null hypothesis) and testing the null hypothesis of one factor driving the dynamics of the volatility process against two factors (which raises identification difficulties). Three ways of implementing the tests based on alternative statistics are compared: asymptotic critical values (when available), a local MonteCarlo (or parametric bootstrap) test procedure, and a maximized Monte Carlo (MMC) procedure. The size and power properties of the proposed tests are examined in a simulation experiment. The results indicate that the C(alpha)-based tests (built upon thesimple moment estimator available in closed form) have good size and power properties for regular hypotheses, while Monte Carlo tests are much more reliable than those based on asymptotic critical values. Further, in cases where the parametric bootstrapappears to fail (for example, in the presence of identification problems), the MMC procedure easily controls the level of the tests. Moreover, MMC-based tests exhibit relatively good power performance despite the conservative feature of the procedure. Finally, we present an application to a time series of returns on the Standard and Poor's Composite Price Index.
机译:我们研究关于一因素和两因素随机波动率模型(SV)的参数的假设检验问题,考虑到可能存在非正则性,例如奇异矩条件和不确定的参数,这可能会导致非标准渐近分布。我们专注于基于仿真的精确程序的开发-可以在有限样本中控制其水平-以及在非常规条件下仍然有效的大样本程序。我们考虑基于简单矩估计器的Wald型,得分型和似然比型测试,这些测试很容易模拟。我们还提出了Cα型测试,该测试非常容易实现,并且具有相对较好的尺寸和功率特性。除了对SV模型系数的通常线性限制外,研究的问题还包括针对SV替代测试同方差(在零假设下涉及奇异矩条件)以及对一个驱动波动率过程对两个因素进行动力学的因素的零假设(这会带来识别困难)。比较了基于替代统计量执行测试的三种方法:渐近临界值(如果可用),局部MonteCarlo(或参数引导程序)测试过程以及最大化Monte Carlo(MMC)过程。拟议测试的尺寸和功率特性在仿真实验中进行了检查。结果表明,基于Cα的检验(建立在闭合形式的简单矩估计量的基础上)对于常规假设具有良好的大小和幂性质,而蒙特卡洛检验比基于渐近临界值的检验更加可靠。此外,在参数引导程序似乎失败的情况下(例如,在存在识别问题的情况下),MMC程序可轻松控制测试的级别。此外,基于MMC的测试尽管具有保守的功能,但仍具有相对较好的电源性能。最后,我们提出了对标准普尔综合价格指数的时间序列回报的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号