首页> 外文期刊>Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association >Comparing Subcutaneous Fluid Infusion with Intravenous Fluid Infusion in Children
【24h】

Comparing Subcutaneous Fluid Infusion with Intravenous Fluid Infusion in Children

机译:儿童皮下输液与静脉输液的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: This study examined subcutaneous (SC) infusion as a parenteral alternative for children with mild to moderate illness. The purpose was to compare the difference in infusion start time of parenteral fluid between an initial SC order and an initial intravenous (IV) order. In addition, the number of needlesticks a child received for each method was evaluated. This study also sought to address the following question: If SC fluids were given and an IV attempt was made later, did the administration of SC fluids enhance the success of venous cannulation? Methods: A retrospective descriptive design was used for review of medical records for 36 children from November 2008 to May 2010 who had received SC fluids only or received SC fluids after 2 or more failed IV attempts, Results: The IV/SC group had significantly longer time to infusion (M= 97.33 minutes) than did the SC group [M= 20.95 minutes; U= .000; P< .001). The IV/SC group included the number of needlesticks for the intravenous attempts plus the needle stick needed for the subcutaneous infusion, A significant difference was found between the 2 groups (mean IV = 4.87; mean SC = 1; Z= .000; P< .001). Discussion: In a child who is not seriously ill, SC infusions appear to facilitate the initiation of parenteral rehydration. SC infusions minimized the number of needlesticks a child endured. More study is needed to determine if SC fluids enhance success of subsequent venous cannulation. Dehydration is defined as a clinical state involving the loss of fluid from the body. Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) is the first-line therapy recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention since 1992 and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) since 1996 for children with mild to moderate dehydration. When ORT fails, nasogastric tube (NGT) or intravenous (IV) therapy is recommended by the AAP; however, these methods may result in increased complications, costs, skills, and time needed. In addition, NGT and IV therapy may only be performed in certain settings. Subcutaneous (SC) infusion of fluid once was a standard of care from the 1940s through the early 1960s and is now resurfacing as an alternative to IV therapy in children who are mildly to moderately ill. Whereas acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is one of the most common reasons that children present to the emergency department for fluid rehydration therapy, other conditions may include respiratory, genitourinary, and febrile illnesses. The degree of dehydration may complicate recovery. The gold standard for estimating the degree of dehydration is a documented weight loss generally from 1% to 10% or more; however, in an urgent or emergency care setting, a recent weight usually is not documented for comparison. In 1997, approximately 10 clinical dehydration findings were validated for the first time in an effort to guide clinicians in determining an estimation of a child's fluid deficit when a recent weight was not available. The most current validated clinical dehydration score has refined and revalidated those findings, but only 4 of the clinical findings (appearance, eyes, tears, and tongue) were determined as most important when evaluating the degree of dehydration.
机译:简介:这项研究检查了皮下注射(SC)作为轻度至中度疾病儿童的肠胃外替代疗法。目的是比较初始SC指令和初始静脉(IV)指令之间肠胃外输液开始时间的差异。此外,评估了每种方法接收的儿童针刺数量。这项研究还试图解决以下问题:如果给予SC输液并在以后进行静脉输液尝试,SC输液是否能提高静脉插管的成功率?方法:采用回顾性描述性设计,回顾了2008年11月至2010年5月间仅接受SC输液或两次IV尝试失败后接受SC输液的36名儿童的病历,结果:IV / SC组的时间明显更长输注时间(M = 97.33分钟)比SC组[M = 20.95分钟; U = .000; P <.001)。 IV / SC组包括静脉内尝试的针刺数和皮下输注所需的针刺数,两组之间存在显着差异(平均值IV = 4.87;平均SC = 1; Z = 0.00; P <.001)。讨论:在一个没有重病的孩子中,SC输注似乎有助于肠胃外补液的开始。 SC输液可最大程度地减少儿童忍受的针刺数量。需要更多的研究来确定SC液是否能增强随后静脉插管的成功率。脱水被定义为涉及从体内流失液体的临床状态。口服补液疗法(ORT)是1992年以来疾病预防控制中心和1996年以来美国儿科学会(AAP)推荐的轻度至中度脱水儿童的一线治疗方法。当ORT失败时,AAP建议进行鼻胃管(NGT)或静脉内(IV)治疗。但是,这些方法可能会导致复杂性,成本,技能和所需时间的增加。此外,NGT和IV治疗只能在特定环境中进行。从1940年代到1960年代初期,皮下输注液体曾经是一种标准的护理方法,现在正逐渐替代轻度至中度患病儿童的静脉输注疗法。急性胃肠炎(AGE)是儿童出现在急诊室进行补液治疗的最常见原因之一,而其他情况可能包括呼吸道疾病,泌尿生殖道疾病和发热性疾病。脱水程度可能会使恢复过程复杂化。估计脱水程度的金标准是有文件记录的重量减轻,通常从1%到10%或更多;但是,在紧急或紧急护理环境中,通常没有记录最近的体重以供比较。 1997年,首次验证了大约10个临床脱水结果,以指导临床医生确定在没有最近体重时儿童体液缺乏的估计值。最新的经过验证的临床脱水评分对这些发现进行了细化和重新验证,但在评估脱水程度时,只有4项临床发现(外观,眼睛,眼泪和舌头)被确定为最重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号